心理科学 2017, 40(6) 1302-1308 DOI:     ISSN: 0412-1961 CN: 21-1139/TG

本期目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索                                                            [打印本页]   [关闭]
基础、实验与工效
扩展功能
本文信息
Supporting info
PDF(0KB)
[HTML全文]
参考文献[PDF]
参考文献
服务与反馈
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
引用本文
Email Alert
文章反馈
浏览反馈信息
本文关键词相关文章
隐喻义
本义
ERP
熟悉性
本文作者相关文章
郭晶晶
赵婧超
PubMed
Article by Guo,J.J
Article by Diao,J.T
熟悉性对汉语隐喻义与本义加工机制的影响
郭晶晶,赵婧超
陕西师范大学心理学院
摘要: 采用句子违反范式考察汉语隐喻义与本义加工机制的差异及隐喻熟悉性的调节作用。要求被试阅读不同熟悉性的隐喻和本义句子并判断句子正确性,记录其行为与脑电反应。结果显示,熟悉句子隐喻义的加工显著快于本义的加工,而新奇句子则本义的加工更快;脑电水平上,对于熟悉句子,隐喻义违反比本义违反诱发增强的N400和降低的P600效应,而对于新奇句子,隐喻义和本义违反诱发出基本类似的ERP反应。这些结果表明隐喻义和本义加工存在差异,熟悉性显著影响隐喻义的加工,这种影响在较早语义分析和较晚的语义整合阶段均有体现。
关键词隐喻义   本义   ERP   熟悉性  
The Influence of Semantic Familiarity on Metaphorical and Literal Meanings’ Access in Sentence Processing
Abstract: In everyday life we always try to get the metaphorical beyond the literal meanings of sentences we come across. Metaphor is a kind of frequently used language expression, also a basic way of thinking for human surviving. So how is metaphor processed? Whether the metaphorical meanings can be accessed independent from the literal meanings or they’re based on the access of the literal meanings. Different from Searle’s Hierarchical Hypothesis (1993) and Glucksberg et al.’ Parallel Hypothesis (1982), Giora’s Graded Salience Hypothesis (2003) emphasized the importance of semantic salience in metaphor comprehension, if the metaphorical meanings were salient or familiar to readers, they can be comprehended prior to literal meanings and vice versa. The current study aimed to investigate the influence of semantic familiarity of sentences on the metaphor processing using behavioral and ERPs methods and tried to resolve the theoretical disputes. Experiment 1 employed a sentential violation paradigm to investigate the behavioral effects of familiarity on metaphor processing. We selected 28 nouns as the subjects of familiar sentences, and the other 28 nouns as the subjects of novel sentences. Then we made a metaphorical and a literal sentence for each noun, and a related incorrect metaphorical or literal version. So we made 224 sentences in total, which were screened and split into 4 lists. Each list contained the same number of sentences for each condition and was presented to a participant to counterbalance the sequence effects. Participants were asked to judge the acceptability of the sentences by key pressing and the reaction time (RT) and accuracy rate (ACC) were recorded. The results showed that the RT to judge the metaphorical sentences was faster and the ACC was higher for the familiar sentences, but for the novel sentences, the RT to process the literal sentences was faster and the ACC was higher. These results showed that the familiarity could modulate the processing of metaphorical meanings, and metaphorical meanings could be accessed prior to the literal processing. To further explore which processes of sentence processing the semantic familiarity can modulate, experiment 2 used high time-resolution ERPs with the similar experimental design to examine if the familiarity would influence the deflection of N400 or P600. The results showed that the metaphorical and literal processing elicited comparable N400 and P600 effects for novel sentences, while metaphorical processing induced enhanced N400 and reduced P600 effects for familiar sentences relative to literal processing. N400 is concerned to be correlated with the efforts of semantic retrieval, analysis (Kutas & Hillyard, 1980), the enhanced N400 for novel metaphorical sentences processing means difficulty of analyzing the semantic information. P600 tends to reflect the sentential reanalysis, integration or reflection (Holcomb, 1988), so the reduced P600 in familiar metaphorical processing might suggest that participants fail to deepen the processing of metaphor when be confronted with the abnormal sentences since they have difficulty in earlier sematic processing stage. Taken together, the present study demonstrates that participants can access metaphorical meanings efficiently, when the metaphor is familiar to them. While the metaphor is novel, the processing of metaphorical meaning may be based on the access of literal meanings. These results provide clear evidence for Giora’s Graded Salience Hypothesis.
Keywords: Metaphorical meanings   Literal meanings   Event Related Potential(ERP)   Familiarity  
DOI:
基金项目:

通讯作者: 郭晶晶
作者简介:
作者Email: guojjok@snnu.edu.cn

参考文献:
本刊中的类似文章
1.刘涛 马鹏举 于亮 刘俊飞 杨亦鸣.汉语名-动兼类效应的神经机制研究[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(3): 546-551
2.钟毅平 周海波 周路平 陈芸 范伟.显性度对隐喻加工的影响:事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(3): 527-531
3.徐莹 张庆林.不同程度吸烟者内隐态度测量范式下的ERP研究[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(3): 709-713
4.王晓娜 李琦 郭春彦.语义相似性下回忆和熟悉性的分离[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(5): 1068-1071
5.毛伟宾.跨视听通道的相继错误记忆效应[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(3): 574-580
6.张忠炉 邢强 唐志文 徐争鸣 蔡新华.酝酿期有效提示和无效提示的比较[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(4): 901-905
7.常晶晶 刘强 邱江.异同判断中“快同效应”的大脑机制:一项ERP研究[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(4): 829-835
8.吴念阳 陈俊卿 居银 白洁 马子凤.汉语隐喻理解时程的ERPs研究[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(4): 811-816
9.刘耀中 唐志文 叶海英.预期背离下奖励与惩罚的ERPs研究[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(4): 806-810
10.孙晓 李肖 贾磊 张庆林.自我姓名加工的相对独特性:来自RSVP的证据[J]. 心理科学, 2013,36(1): 72-77

Copyright by 心理科学