心理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 1399-1404.

• 发展与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于反馈加工的规则学习:研究儿童认知灵活性的新范式

李富洪1,孙芬2   

  1. 1. 江西师范大学
    2. 辽宁师范大学心理学院
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-13 修回日期:2017-07-09 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2017-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 李富洪

Feedback based Category learning: A new task of exploring children’s cognitive flexibility

  • Received:2016-12-13 Revised:2017-07-09 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2017-11-20

摘要: 本研究旨在探索同一任务范式考察年龄范围更大儿童(5-11岁)的认知灵活性。在威斯康星卡片分类任务(WCST)的基础上设计了目标选择任务(Target Choose Task, TCT),并选取181名儿童完成TCT,其中24名儿童同时完成WCST。结果表明,TCT题目通过率是界于32%和65.7%之间,表明其难度适中。TCT高分组均数显著高于低分组,表明其具有良好的区分度。按照每一名儿童每一题题号的奇偶分半,计算分半信度,结果表明两类题目的得分正相关显著,说明TCT的内部一致性较高。TCT分数与WCST完成分类数和概念化水平数分别呈正相关,说明TCT效度良好。这些结果表明TCT可以在更大的年龄跨度上,研究儿童认知灵活性,而且更侧重儿童在概念或规则形成过程中依据不同反馈保持或切换初始假设的认知灵活性。

关键词: 认知灵活性, 假设保持, 假设切换, 目标选择任务, 儿童

Abstract: Previous?researches investigated children’s?cognitive flexibility?of varying age groups by using different?paradigms. Wisconsin?Card?Sorting?Test (WCST) was one of the most widely used tests of executive function in clinical and research contexts. These researchers drew?different?or even?contrary?conclusions. Predecessors' researches?pay a lot of attention to cognitive flexibility which refers to a scene when previous rule is shown to be ineffective then flexibly switch to a new rule according to feedback. To explore a new?unified method in studying cognitive flexibility in rule acquisition for wider age range (5-11 years) children, in the present work,?a?novel test named Target Choose Task (TCT)was designed based on WCST. TCT concerns individual cognitive flexibility, which specifically refers to whether one could resist or switch initial hypotheses flexibly according to different feedback in rule acquisition. Another aim is to carry out a preliminary discussion of development and fast period of children’s cognitive flexibility. Additionally, to study the reliability, validity, difficulty and discrimination of TCT. TCT consisted of 63 three-dimensional stimuli boxes. Each of them comprised three perceptual dimensions, shape (square, trapezoid, triangle or circle), color (red, green, blue or yellow), and pattern (star, gridding, streak). TCT was composed of 9 trials, in each trial of which participants were provided with 1 target stimulus box and 6 reference stimuli boxes, and were asked to match one of the 6 reference stimuli boxes to the target stimulus box based on a classification rule. Participants received feedback after each match. The cognitive flexibility (set shifting) was investigated with TCT in 181 participants (from kindergarten to fifth grades; mean age 8.4 years ; age rage: 5-11 years old; 86 males) selected randomly from an ordinary kindergarten and an ordinary primary school. Twenty-four participants (grade: from second to third grade; mean age 8.9 years; age rage: 7-10 years; 10 males) also participated in the computer version of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The participants completed the test individually. The results were following, (1) All TCT scores show a positively skewed distribution; (2) There is a positive correlation between TCT accuracy and WCST accuracy; (3) The TCT score respectively has significant correlations with Categories Completed (CC) and Conceptual Level Responses(CLR)of WCST; (4) While, no statistically significant difference is found between “B type error” of TCT and Percent Perseverative Errors(PPE)of WCST; (5) The split-half reliability coefficient was calculated. One half text items significantly correlate with the other half; (6) High-scoring group have significantly higher level comparing to low-scoring group in TCT score; (7) TCT scores of all subjects rage from 0 to 8 (mean score ± SD: 3.78 ± 1.9). (8) The pass rate of each TCT test for all participants is from 0.32 to 0.66, implying that the difficulty index of TCT is moderate. In summary, psychometric properties analysis showed that TCT achieved to an excellent level of internal consistency, criterion-related validity, distinction index and moderate level of difficulty. It is a reasonable new method of exploring cognitive flexibility.

Key words: cognitive flexibility, hypothesis maintain, hypothesis shifting, target choose task, children

中图分类号: