心理科学 2018, (2) 258-263 DOI:     ISSN: 0412-1961 CN: 21-1139/TG

本期目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索                                                            [打印本页]   [关闭]
基础、实验与工效
扩展功能
本文信息
Supporting info
PDF(597KB)
[HTML全文]
参考文献[PDF]
参考文献
服务与反馈
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
引用本文
Email Alert
文章反馈
浏览反馈信息
本文关键词相关文章
【关键词】奖赏
自我加工
内隐记忆
外显记忆
本文作者相关文章
钟毅平
吴云
范伟
PubMed
Article by Zhong,Y.B
Article by Wu,y
Article by Fan,w
奖赏与自我加工对记忆的影响
钟毅平1,吴云2,范伟3,4
1. 湖南师范大学
2. 湖南科技职业学院
3. 湖南师范大学教育科学学院
4. 中国科学院心理研究所
摘要: 【摘 要】目的:从外显和内隐层面探讨奖赏与自我加工对记忆的影响。方法:以大学生为被试,以人格形容词为实验材料,采用R/K范式,测量被试对识记词语的记忆效果。结果:(1)外显记忆层面,奖赏与自我加工均促进了记忆效果;(2)在内隐记忆层面,自我存在记忆的加工优势,但是没有发现奖赏加工对记忆的影响。结论:自我相关刺激促进了内隐和外显记忆的加工,奖赏刺激只对外显记忆有影响,实验结果支持独立平行模型,即在不同记忆层面,奖赏加工与自我参照加工存在不同加工机制。
关键词【关键词】奖赏   自我加工   内隐记忆   外显记忆  
The Effects of reward and self processing on memory
Abstract: 【Abstract】Reward is often defined as a kind of stimulus that can be acquired through a specific task. Previous show that rewards can improve memory processing procedure. What's more, the study found that information related to self can be better processed and memorized. As we all know, reward-processing and self-processing are two kinds of important cognitive- processing period, but there is no related research carries on the discussion about how to effect on memory at the same time. Although studies have proved that matching with reward and self both can promote the cognitive process, reward and self processing characteristics in the different level of memory processing has not examined.According to the model of parallel processing of reward and self, we assumes that reward processing and self processing can enhance memory effect at the same time. And according to the degree of participation of consciousness, we can divided memory into two levels: explicit memory and implicit memory. We want to examine the difference between self and reward processing from the different memory level. Experiments has control the interference effect of depression and self-esteem factors on memory. We proposed to adopt reward prompt paradigm, R/K paradigm and the signal detection theory to analysis the difference between reward and self processing effects on memory of explicit and implicit level.This experiment adopts Multiple-Variable Experiment. The two factors in experimental design is reward and self condition. we divide reward conditions into reward and no reward group, and self conditions into self and friend group. Experimental material comes from "The personality adjectives library". We select 160 personality adjectives about personality, including 80 positive and negative adjectives (arousal, significance degree and titer match). The experiment is carried out in a quiet lab. Subjects first fill in the relevant demographic information (gender, age), then complete the Beck depression rating scale and self-esteem scale. Formal experimental process present in the E - Prime2.0, the experiment was divided into three stages, the first stage is learning personality words , the second part is the interference phase, the third part is the memory test phase. The experimental total duration for 20 minutes.The results showed that: (1) In the level of explicit memory, reward and self processing promoted the memory effect, reward effect is significantly,p<0.001,ηp2= 0.373; self–reference effect is significantly,F(1,32) = 24.170,p<0.001,ηp2=0.329; Interactions effect of reward and self is marginally significant, F(1,32) = 3.227,p = 0.082,ηp2= 0.092; According to the previous literature, reward processing can promote cognitive process. In order to verify the reward of self-reference effect to strengthen, we define:b1= self reward group - self without reward;b2 = acquaintances reward group - acquaintances without reward Paired sample t test was carried out on the b1and b2, t (32) = 1.798, p < 0.05, We found that b1 significantly greater than the b2, the date illustrates the reward can enhance self-reference effect. (2) We found self-advantages in the implicit memory, but no reward processing effects on memory. Main effect of self conditions is significantly, F(1,32)=13.57,p<0.01,ηp2=0.304; Reward conditions is no significant main effect, F(1,32)=0.09,p=0.76; Reference conditions with reward conditions interaction effect is significantly, F(1,32)=4.898,p< 0.05,ηp2=0.136. Then ,we use simple effect analyze found that under the condition of reward, self-reference effect of implicit memory is significantly higher than acquaintances reference conditions, F(1,32)=13.17,p<0 .01. Under the condition of non-reward, implicit memory of self-reference effect is significantly higher than acquaintances reference conditions, F(1,32)=64.39,p<0.01; Under the condition of self, reward effect is not significant, F(1,32)=2.56,p>0.05. Conclusion: self relevant stimulus to promote the processing of implicit and explicit memory, reward stimulation only influence memory effects, the results support the independent parallel model, namely in the different level of memory, reward processing and self-reference processing has different processing mechanism.
Keywords: 【Key words】 reward   self   implicit memory   explicit memory  
DOI:
基金项目:

通讯作者: 吴云
作者简介:
作者Email: VereWuyun@126.com

参考文献:
本刊中的类似文章
1.林贤浩 林世泽 郑金炽 林泽涯 林辉.精神分裂症患者的记忆损害[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(2): 477-480
2.刘凤英 袁加锦 李红.人名相关自我加工的时间过程——事件相关电位研究提供的电生理证据[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(6): 1289-1294
3.王娟 张积家 谢书书 袁爱玲.内隐学习中东巴文促进幼儿汉字字形记忆的研究[J]. 心理科学, 2013,36(1): 145-149
4.刘庆英 冯正直 陈旭 戴琴.非临床抑郁个体内隐心境一致性记忆的意识加工和无意识加工的差异:一项ERP研究[J]. 心理科学, 2013,36(2): 344-349

Copyright by 心理科学