心理科学 2018, (3) 601-607 DOI:     ISSN: 0412-1961 CN: 21-1139/TG

本期目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索                                                            [打印本页]   [关闭]
发展与教育
扩展功能
本文信息
Supporting info
PDF(0KB)
[HTML全文]
参考文献[PDF]
参考文献
服务与反馈
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
引用本文
Email Alert
文章反馈
浏览反馈信息
本文关键词相关文章
视觉搜索
小学生
找不同
眼动
本文作者相关文章
王华容
施利承
缪绿青
谭顶良
PubMed
Article by Yu,H.R
Article by Yi,L.Z
Article by Mu,L.J
Article by Tan,D.L
小学生在交通情境中的视觉搜索:发展的观点
王华容1,施利承1,缪绿青1,谭顶良2
1. 江苏南通大学
2. 南京师范大学
摘要: 为探讨小学生在交通情境中的视觉搜索发展特点,研究以一、二、四和六年级小学生,以及成人为被试,采用“找不同”任务和过马路决策眼动任务进行实验。结果发现,一、二年级小学生“找不同”的效率低于成人;一年级小学生冒险及错失过马路比例均较高;小学生的眼跳特征与成人相似,但对兴趣区的关注低于成人;女生错失过马路比例高于男生,视觉搜索水平及搜索策略的性别差异不显著。研究表明,小学生的视觉搜索能力随年龄逐渐提高,但搜索的有效性低于成人,性别分化不明显。
关键词视觉搜索   小学生   找不同   眼动  
The development of pupil’s visual search in traffic situation
Abstract: Visual search is an important component of pedestrians’ interaction with traffic situation, which allowing them to successfully identify external cues that impact their decision-making. Previous research has identified that children under the age of 14 are particularly vulnerable to road accidents as pedestrians, and a number of motivational and cognitive skill factors which may play a part in it. Studies have shown that children with low visual search are more likely to take risks when crossing the road. However,in the traffic situation, whether children's level of visual search, and searching strategy is the same with that of the adults, it is less mentioned in previous studies. We aimed to explore the development of pupils’ visual search as pedestrians. The sample consisted of 160 Chinese pupils from a common primary urban school, including 42 in Grade 1, 43 in Grade 2, 41 in Grade 4 and 34 in Grade 6. In addition, 41adults volunteers aged between 18 and 27 years were recruited from a university in Nantong city. All subjects completed two experiments: ‘spot the difference’ was used to assess subject’s visual search ability, while visual search strategies were studied by analyzing the eye movements of the children and the adults while they were carrying out the video task. In experiment 1, there were 34 pairs of pictures were chosen as stimulus materials, including 30 pairs for experiment and 4 pairs for practice. The subjects were asked to spot all the differences on each of the picture pairs as quickly as possible, but they were not told how many differences in each pair. In experiment 2, a simulated road environment of moving traffic was designed by video designers. The subjects’ eye-movements were recorded by Smart Eye 3D Eye Tracking System. Participants were instructed to observe the traffic video, and had a response when they thought it was safe to cross. The results showed that as pupils growing, their efficiency in “spot the differences” task improved continually. However, pupils in grade 1 and 2 still didn’t perform as well as the adults, (p﹤.01). The performance in “spot the difference” had no significant differences between boys and girls (p﹥.05). Compared with adults, the pupils behaved much more missing crossing and less safety crossing (p﹤.05). Specially, among the pupils, the pupil in grade 4 had the least times of adventure crossing, while missed the most times to cross the road (p﹤.05). The girl’s missing crossing was much more than the boys (p﹤.01). Pupils’ eye gaze in the region of interest were different from the adults’, that the adults’ fixation duration was much longer than the pupils (p﹤.001), and the fixation counts were much more than the pupils (p﹤.05), except on the curve. However, pupils’ saccade amplitude and saccade velocity in the whole traffic video are not different from the adults’ (p﹥.05). Results demonstrate that pupils' traffic visual searching ability goes up as they grow, and visual searching strategies become more reasonable and useful. However, they are still on a low level compared with adults. Visual search for grade four pupils (9-10 years of age) has developed significantly. Visual search doesn’t vary with gender on the whole.
Keywords: visual search   pupil   spot the difference   eye movement  
DOI:
基金项目:

通讯作者: 谭顶良
作者简介:
作者Email: tandingliang@sohu.com

参考文献:
本刊中的类似文章
1.王福兴 白学军 闫国利 周宗奎.电影观看过程中的字幕偏好性:声音的影响作用[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(1): 44-49
2.杨丽珠 徐敏 马世超.小学生同伴接纳对其人格发展的影响:友谊质量的多层级中介效应[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(1): 93-99
3.白学军 曹玉肖 顾俊娟 郭志英 闫国利.可预测性和空格对中文阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(6): 1282-1288
4.于泽 韩玉昌.书面韵律边界与语境对歧义句歧义消解的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(6): 1320-1324
5.罗新玉 陈睿 高鑫 邹吉林 周仁来.抑郁情绪大学生反应抑制的眼动特点[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(6): 1289-1293
6.唐浩 韩玉昌 于爱华.不同视觉区域OUP效应的眼动研究[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(5): 1072-1078
7.杨萌 王剑桥 夏裕祁 杨帆 张学民.背景音乐的节奏与歌词语言熟悉程度对驾驶行为和眼动的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(5): 1056-1061
8.杨萌 刘丹玮 蔡安妮 周仁来.自由观看实景图片时注意的空间偏向[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(2): 258-263
9.白学军 郭志英 曹玉肖 顾俊娟 闫国利 臧传丽.词切分对印-英双语者阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(3): 544-549
10.陈顺森 白学军 沈德立 张灵聪.背景性质对7-10岁自闭症谱系障碍儿童面孔搜索与加工的作用[J]. 心理科学, 2012,35(4): 778-785

Copyright by 心理科学