心理科学 2018, (3) 706-712 DOI:     ISSN: 0412-1961 CN: 21-1139/TG

本期目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索                                                            [打印本页]   [关闭]
社会、人格与管理
扩展功能
本文信息
Supporting info
PDF(0KB)
[HTML全文]
参考文献[PDF]
参考文献
服务与反馈
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
引用本文
Email Alert
文章反馈
浏览反馈信息
本文关键词相关文章
道德
领导正直
情境
个体差异
本土文化
本文作者相关文章
王婷
杨付
PubMed
Article by Yu,t
Article by Yang,f
领导正直的概念、测量及其展望
王婷,杨付
西南财经大学
摘要: 领导正直(leader integrity)作为一种道德品质,长期以来被认为是有效领导者的关键特征。近年来, 道德丑闻和管理者违法乱纪事件频频发生,引发了学术界对领导正直问题的关注。然而,学界对领导正直 的内涵、测量及其作用机制的研究尚处于起步阶段,关于领导正直的文献综述更是寥寥无几。本文从领导 正直的概念、测量、影响因素、作用机制和实施效果等方面,对国内外相关研究进行系统梳理和探讨。未 来研究应从领导正直的概念与维度的完善、影响因素的拓展和作用机制的深入识别等方面展开努力。
关键词道德   领导正直   情境   个体差异   本土文化  
Leader integrity: Conception, measurement, and prospect
2
Abstract: In recent years, the corporate scandals and management malfeasances in organizations like Enron, Adelphia Communications, WorldCom, and Tyco International, occurred frequently and have sparked a growing interest about leader integrity. As a frontier topic in the field of leader research, leader integrity has garnered extensive attention from organizational scholars and practitioners. Leader integrity has long been mentioned as a key part of effective leadership. However, researches on leader integrity’s conception, dimension, measurement, mediation and moderation remain incomplete. By systematically clarifying the conception of leader integrity, its dimension, measurement, antecedents and consequences, this study summarizes and evaluates relative research at home and abroad. There are two recent definitions of leader integrity within the organizational literature. First, leader integrity is defined as a general description of moral and ethical behavior, which includes perceived leader integrity and some aspects of ethical leader behavior. Second, leader integrity refers to perception of the consistency between a leader’s words and deeds. However, leader integrity is often associated with or mentioned in conjunction with individual traits such as honesty, fairness, sincerity and trustworthiness. In some cases, integrity has simply been viewed as synonymous with honesty. The basic definition of leader integrity should emphasize moral behavior and consistency between a person’s espoused values and behavior. Future research should further explore the definition of leader integrity and provide a theoretical foundation for leader integrity at home and abroad. In the field of leadership, two instruments have been developed to measure integrity. The first measure of leader integrity was developed by Craig and Gustafson (1998). The second instrument is Simons,Friedman,Liu and McLean’s (2007) Leadership Behavior Integrity Scale. Both instruments rely upon subordinates’ perceptions of leader behavior. There may be other ways to measure integrity which complement the current approaches. For example, a neutral third-party observer may be able to provide a measure of integrity by careful observation. Self-rating of integrity may also mitigate potential bias from social desirability. A plethora of empirical research has looked at identifying factors that influence leader integrity, such as individual differences, leadership styles, and leadership intervention. Some qualitative studies suggested that organizational characteristics, organizational climate, individual traits were correlated with leadership integrity. Empirical research has confirmed the impact of leadership integrity on followers’ attitudes, behaviors, and performance. In the team level, some studies found that team leader integrity was positively related to team members’ moral intention, trust, and innovation. Although scholars have investigated the effects of leader integrity on followers’ outcomes, considerably less is known about the mediating and moderating mechanisms. In the terms of mediation, previous studies indicated that leader behavioral integrity was not directly related to follower job performance, but was related indirectly via trust in the leader and follower satisfaction with the leader. According to contingency theory of leadership, leadership effectiveness is largely influenced by subordinates’ individual differences. The individual differences may play a key role on the relationship between leader integrity and followers’ outcomes. There are several limitations in the previous studies, which, in turn point to promising directions for future research. First, future research should explore the definition of leader integrity and develop its measurement in the Chinese organizational context. Second, based on the perspective of individual characteristics, future research should focus on examining the antecedents of leader integrity, such as self-control, conscientiousness, and machiavellism. Third, from the perspective of culture values, future research should investigate the effectiveness of leader integrity in the Chinese organizational context.
Keywords: moral   leader integrity   context   individual differences   Chinese indigenous culture  
DOI:
基金项目:

通讯作者: 王婷
作者简介:
作者Email: wangt827@163.com

参考文献:
本刊中的类似文章
1.王挺 肖三蓉 徐光兴.人格特质、家庭环境对中学生道德判断能力的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(3): 664-669
2.廖凤林 蒲小波.大学生作弊:是道德自我欺骗吗?[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(6): 1448-1452
3.王云强 郭本禹.大学生道德人格特点的初步研究[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(6): 1436-1440
4.王瑞明 邹艳荣 曾祥炎 吕超 罗漫.连贯阅读中文本表征的意识性研究[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(4): 819-823
5.张景焕 王亚男 初玉霞 徐希铮.三种压力与创意自我效能感对创造力的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(4): 993-998
6.庞维国.《吕氏春秋》智力观探析[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(2): 505-509
7.唐芳贵 岑国桢.德性自我意象、道德情绪与行为自我管理:对大学生的一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(2): 371-375
8.刘晓洁 李 丹.集体道德情绪研究述评[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(2): 393-397
9.司继伟 徐艳丽 刘效贞.数学焦虑、问题形式对乘法估算的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(2): 407-413
10.马晓辉 雷雳.青少年网络道德与其网络亲社会行为的关系[J]. 心理科学, 2011,34(2): 423-428

Copyright by 心理科学