心理科学 ›› 2018, Vol. ›› Issue (4): 776-781.

• 基础、实验与工效 • 上一篇    下一篇

语义联系对关联再认神经机制的调节

聂爱情,吴苑颖,李旻烨   

  1. 浙江大学心理与行为科学系
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-14 修回日期:2018-06-07 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 聂爱情

The Modulation of Semantic Relation on the Neural Mechanism of Associative Recognition

  • Received:2017-11-14 Revised:2018-06-07 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-20
  • Contact: Aiqing Nie

摘要: 已有研究显示,关联再认可记录到分别反映双重加工模型的两阶段(即熟悉和回忆)的ERP成分(即FN400和LPC成分),且具有高语义联系配对的关联再认可通过整合在基于熟悉加工的基础上完成。然而,不同语义联系对关联再认神经机制的影响及单个项目的熟悉和回忆加工的调节作用尚未揭示。为此,本研究比较了主题相关和类别相关图形关联再认的波形波幅异同,并分析了单个项目的熟悉和回忆加工对配对识别的影响。结果显示,主题相关和类别相关条件的旧配对、重组配对和“旧+新”配对均记录到反映熟悉加工的FN400成分,主题相关条件的旧配对、重组配对和“旧+新”配对均记录到反映回忆加工的LPC成分,类别相关条件的旧配对记录到LPC成分。表明关联再认的神经机制受语义联系所调节,单个项目的熟悉程度可影响配对识别时的神经机制,上述结论支持双重加工模型。

关键词: 语义联系, 关联再认, 熟悉, FN400, LPC

Abstract: Previous research has revealed two different old/new effects, the early mid-frontal old/new effect (a.k.a. FN400 component) and the late parietal old/new effect (a.k.a. LPC component), which reflect dual-process model’s two processes of familiarity and recollection respectively. Though associative recognition is thought to be more based on recollection rather than familiarity compared to item recognition, recent studies have confirmed that familiarity makes greater contribution to associative memory when to-be-remembered items of a pair have a stronger semantic relation. However, it remains unclear whether the modulations of different subtypes of semantic relations on the old/new effect of associative recognition are different. The roles of the processes of familiarity and recollection of a single item that belongs to a pair also require further investigations. Using event-related potential technique (Neuroscan), the current study aimed to explore the modulations of different subtypes of semantic relations on the waveforms of associative recognition. The current experiment was a within-subject design, which had semantic relation and paired type of pictures as variables, the levels of semantic relation were thematic and taxonomic relations, and the levels of paired type of pictures were new pair, old pair, rearranged pair, and “old + new” pair. A total of 22 right-handed adults, aged 23.83 ± 5.21 years, participated in the current experiment. In the experiment, 672 named pictures (336 pairs) which were all from Hemera Color Gallery served as stimuli, and the procedure was conducted via the continuous recognition paradigm. During the whole experiment, participants were instructed to study paired pictures with two different semantic relations (thematic and taxonomic relations) and to make discriminations among new, old, rearranged, and “old+new” pairs. The results showed that, under both thematic and taxonomic relation conditions, the FN400 component (during 350–500 ms) that related to familiarity process was confirmed for old, rearranged, and “old+new” pairs. In other words, compared to new pairs, more positive-going waveforms were confirmed over frontal region for old, rearranged, and “old+new” pairs. Under the thematic relation condition, reliable LPC component (during 500–650 ms) that related to recollection process was observed for old, rearranged, and “old+new” pairs. That is to say, more positive-going waveforms over parietal region were elicited by old, rearranged, and “old+new” pairs than by new pairs. For the taxonomic relation, the LPC component was only elicited by old pairs, showing more positive-going waveforms over parietal region for old pairs versus new pairs. To conclude, the old/new effect differences between the studies of current pictures and previous words indicate that the old/new effect of associative recognition is not only semantic-relation-sensitive but also stimulus-specific. The old/new effect differences between the pairs of thematic relation and of taxonomic relation indicate that the old/new effect of associative recognition is sensitive to semantic relation. The old/new effect elicited by “old+new” pairs suggests that its effect can be affected by the familiarity of a single item of this type of pairs. These results reinforce the dual-process model.

Key words: semantic relation, associative recognition, familiarity, FN400, LPC