心理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. ›› Issue (1): 56-61.

• 发展与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

学习能动性信念对初中生学习行为中情感预测偏差的影响

耿晓伟,范琳琳,赵李娜   

  1. 鲁东大学
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-12 修回日期:2018-08-15 出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 耿晓伟

The Influence of Learning Agency Beliefs on Affective Forecasting Bias in Middle School Students’ Learning Behavior

  • Received:2018-04-12 Revised:2018-08-15 Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-01-20

摘要: 为考察初中生学习中是否存在情感预测偏差及学习能动性信念对情感预测偏差的影响,实验一首先考察初中生学习行为中是否存在情感预测偏差,实验二和实验三分别在实验室和真实情景中考察学习能动性信念对初中生学习行为情感预测偏差的影响。结果表明:(1)初中生学习行为中存在影响偏差,高估了积极和消极学习结果对情绪的影响。(2)学习能动性信念强的学生比学习能动性信念弱的学生对积极学习结果的情感预测偏差更小,对消极学习结果的情感预测偏差更大。

关键词: 学习能动性信念, 初中生, 学习行为, 影响偏差

Abstract: Affective forecasting refers to our predictions about how pleasant or unpleasant certain future events will make us feel. People tend to overestimate the impact of future events on their emotions, which is known as impact bias. The present research focuses on whether there is impact bias in middle school students’ learning behavior and the influence of learning agency belief on affective forecasting of middle school students. To test the hypotheses, three experiments were conducted. In experiment 1, a total of 100 middle school students participated the competition of “who will be the winner”. Before the test, they predicted the pleasantness of success and unpleasantness of failure in the test. After the test, they were told that they had succeeded or failed in the test, and were asked to report their actual pleasantness of success and unpleasantness of failure in the test. Results showed that all the students overestimated both the pleasantness of success and the unpleasantness of failure. In experiment 2, a total of 240 middle school students were told to participate a fake high school entrance examination. According to their scores of learning agency belief scale, they were divided into two groups, one group is with high agency belief and the other one is with low agency belief. Before the test, they predicted the pleasantness of success and unpleasantness of failure in the test. After the test, they were told that they had succeeded or failed in the test, and were asked to report their actual pleasantness of success and unpleasantness of failure in the test. Results showed that for predicting the pleasantness of success, students with high agency beliefs showed smaller impact bias than those with low agency beliefs. However, for predicting the unpleasantness of failure, students with high agency beliefs showed bigger impact bias than those with low agency beliefs. In experiment 3, a total of 300 middle school students participated the final exam. According to their scores of learning agency belief scale, they were divided into two groups, one group is with high agency belief and the other one is with low agency belief. Before the test, they predicted the pleasantness of success and unpleasantness of failure in the test. After the test, they were told that they had succeeded or failed in the test, and were asked to report their actual pleasantness of success and unpleasantness of failure. Results showed that for predicting the pleasantness of success, students with high agency beliefs showed smaller impact bias than those with low agency beliefs. However, for predicting the unpleasantness of failure, students with high agency beliefs showed bigger impact bias than those with low agency beliefs. In sum, the present research found that middle school students overestimated the impact of future learning outcomes on their feelings. Besides, learning agency beliefs influenced middle school students’ impact bias. The present research has both important theoretical and practical implications. Limitations and further research have been discussed as well.

Key words: learning agency beliefs, middle school students, learning behavior, impact bias