心理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 770-777.

• 基础、实验与工效 •    下一篇

不同时距条件下面孔表情知觉的时间整合效应

陈本友,黄希庭   

  1. 西南大学
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-05 修回日期:2011-11-03 出版日期:2012-07-20 发布日期:2012-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 黄希庭
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“时间记忆的分段综合模型的实验研究”;西南大学博士基金项目

Temporal integration effects in facial expression recognition in different temporal duration condition

Ben-You CHEN1,   

  • Received:2011-01-05 Revised:2011-11-03 Online:2012-07-20 Published:2012-09-29

摘要: 通过把面孔表情分割成三部分,按照不同的时间间隔以及不同的呈现时间相继呈现,考察了被试对面孔表情的时间整合效果,以此探讨时间整合的加工过程和影响因素。结果发现:(1)面孔表情的时间整合效果受时间结构和刺激材料的影响。(2)分离呈现的面孔表情能否进行时间整合与SOA的大小有关。(3)面孔表情的时间整合存在类型差异。(4)面孔表情的时间整合是在一个有限的视觉缓冲器内进行的,图像记忆和长时记忆与面孔表情的时间整合过程关系密切。

关键词: 面孔表情,时间整合,整体加工, 记忆

Abstract: Temporal integration is the process of perception processing, which the successively separated stimuli are combined into a significant representation. It is a complicated process, which is known to be influenced by such multiple factors as the temporal structure and stimulus components. Although this process has been explored in inter-stimulus interval in face perception, little is known about temporal integration effect in facial expression recognition, more importantly, there has been no relevant evidence demonstrating that stimulus duration and stimulus category can affect the temporal integration of facial expression. In the present study, the part-whole judgment task was used to examine the influencing factors of temporal integration in facial expression. In two experiments, each of three whole facial expression pictures was segmented into three parts, and each including a salient facial feature: eye, nose or mouth. These parts were presented sequentially to the participants by some interval or presentation duration, with a fixed sequence: eye part first, nose followed and mouth last. Following the last part, a mask which eliminated effects of afterimages or other types of visual persistence was displayed. Then participants were asked to judge the category of facial expression, responding by pressing one of three number keys: “1”, “2” and “3”, corresponding to anger, happy and sad. In experiment 1, each part was presented for 17ms, with five intervals of 50, 100, 200, 600, 900ms between each part in part-face condition, and a whole face as a baseline condition was presented for 50ms. Three factors were manipulated: inter-stimulus interval (50, 100,200,600,900ms), facial expression category (anger, happy and sad), and presentation orientation (upright vs. inverted). 72 participants were divided into six groups, and each group was randomly assigned to each of the six conditions to be tested individually. Each participant was asked to complete all possible combinations of the different levels of the facial expression category and presentation orientation. In experiment 2, each participant completed the same task. In addition to the 2 factors used in experiment 1, the third factor was changed as each part was presented for duration of 14, 50, 100, 200ms with the part interval of 50ms, and as the baseline condition was presented for 17ms. The results showed that inversion effects were found at short intervals (50~200ms) and short presentation duration (14~100ms) in part-face expression condition. And the effects were substantially reduced at long intervals (600~900ms) and long presentation duration (200ms). These demonstrated that participants could store temporally separated facial expression in a short-term visual buffer and integrated them into a single, unified facial expression. Furthermore, the results also showed that the temporal integration performance of the facial expression existed significant difference in different facial expression category. Also, happy expression recognition was easier than other expressions. All the results suggested that the temporal integration of the facial expression was influenced by multiple factors, including temporal structure, such as inter-stimulus interval, stimulus presentation duration, and stimulus feature. It meant that both iconic memory and long-term memory were possibly cognitive processing system involved in temporal integration of the facial expression. Key words facial expression, temporal integration, configural processing, memory.

Key words: facial expression, temporal integration, configural processing, memory