Psychological Entitlement and Unethical Pro-Supervisor Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240415

Abstract

Abstract: The relation between supervisors and subordinates is one of the most important ones at work. Subordinates may consciously engage in unethical behaviors to help their supervisors. For example, subordinates conceal negative information that damages the supervisor's reputation and/or exaggerate the supervisor's work performance to support their supervisors. In view of the potential harm of unethical pro-supervisor behavior to organizations, scholars have called for in-depth exploration of the antecedents and mechanisms of unethical pro-supervisor behavior. Existing research points out that factors, such as the leader bottom-line mentality, subordinate leadership identification, and transformational leadership, have significant impacts on subordinates' unethical pro-supervisor behavior. This stream of research sheds light on the antecedents of unethical pro-supervisor behavior pertaining to supervisors' characteristics and the relation between the supervisors and their subordinates, while ignoring the potential effects of subordinates' individual characteristics in predicting unethical pro-supervisor behavior. It also does not answer the question of “whether and how subordinates' individual characteristics can influence unethical pro-supervisor behavior”.
Drawn upon the social cognition theory and the trait activation theory, the present research explores the mechanism and boundary condition of psychological entitlement on unethical pro-supervisor behavior. We invited 254 on-the-job master students to participate in the survey, who come from different industries such as finance, manufacturing, sales, and education. To reduce common method variance, we conducted two waves of survey with one month-interval. At Time 1, participants were asked to rate the psychological entitlement, leader humor, career self-interest, social desirability, and demographics. At Time 2, participants were asked to rate moral disengagement and unethical pro-supervisor behavior. Two hundred and twenty-five participants completed the two waves of survey with a response rate of 88.6%. Among the participants, 42.9% were male; 70.5% were aged between 26~30; 80.3% have obtained college degree; 56.2% have worked on the current job at least three years; 63.4% and 14.3% were working in state-owned companies and private companies, respectively. The results show that psychological entitlement has a significant and positive impact on moral disengagement, and moral disengagement mediates the effect of psychological entitlement on unethical pro-supervisor behavior. Leader humor not only strengthens the positive relationship between psychological entitlement and moral disengagement, but also strengthens the indirect effects of psychological entitlement on unethical pro-supervisor behavior through moral disengagement. That is, the mediating effect of psychological entitlement on unethical pro-supervisor behavior through moral disengagement is stronger when leader humor is higher rather than lower.
We made several contributions to the literature. First, our research responds to the calls for exploring the antecedents and mechanisms of unethical pro-supervisor behavior from an actor-centric perspective. Second, we found that psychological entitlement is one of the important antecedents of the unethical pro-supervisor behavior, highlighting the dark side of psychological entitlement in the workplace and extending the literature on psychological entitlement. Third, by exploring the moderating role of leader humor, our research not only adds to the boundary conditions of the psychological entitlement, but also enlarges the understanding of the “double-edged sword effect” of leader humor.

Key words: psychological entitlement, unethical pro-supervisor behavior, moral disengagement, leader humor

摘要： 现有研究主要强调了领导者因素对下属亲领导不道德行为的影响,忽视了下属个体特质对这种行为的影响。基于社会认知理论与特质激活理论,本研究探讨了心理特权对亲领导不道德行为的作用机制与边界条件。研究结果表明,心理特权对道德推脱产生显著的正向影响,道德推脱在心理特权与亲领导不道德行为之间起部分中介效应。领导幽默不仅增强了心理特权与道德推脱之间的正向关系,而且调节了心理特权通过道德推脱对亲领导不道德行为的间接影响,即在高领导幽默的条件下,这一中介效应较强。

关键词: 心理特权, 亲领导不道德行为, 道德推脱, 领导幽默

Chen Ge, Liang Yongyi, Fan Yan, Hong Ermei, Wang Tongyao. Psychological Entitlement and Unethical Pro-Supervisor Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2024, 47(4): 887-894.

陈戈, 梁永奕, 范燕, 洪尔浼, 王桐谣. 心理特权与亲领导不道德行为——有调节的中介模型^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 887-894.

References

[1] 陈默, 梁建. (2017). 高绩效要求与亲组织不道德行为: 基于社会认知理论的视角. 心理学报, 49(1), 94-105.
[2] 程垦, 林英晖, 夏青, 郭利敏. (2021). 上下级关系如何影响亲上级非伦理行为?——基于中国文化情境的研究. 外国经济与管理, 43(4), 34-49.
[3] 褚福磊, 王蕊. (2019). 资质过剩感与亲组织不道德行为: 心理特权与谦卑型领导的作用. 心理科学, 42(2), 365-371.
[4] 颜爱民, 曾莎莎. (2018). 亲领导非伦理行为的成因: 来自变革型领导的影响. 中国人力资源开发, 35(9), 63-72.
[5] Barnett, T., & Vaicys, C. (2000). The moderating effect of individuals' perceptions of ethical work climate on ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 351-362.
[6] Brant, K. K., & Castro, S. L. (2019). You can't ignore millennials: Needed changes and a new way forward in entitlement research. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(4), 527-538.
[7] Campbell W. K., Bonacci A. M., Shelton J., Exline J. J., & Bushman B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29-45.
[8] Cooper C. D., Kong D. T., & Crossley C. D. (2018). Leader humor as an interpersonal resource: Integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 769-796.
[9] Egan V., Hughes N., & Palmer E. J. (2015). Moral disengagement, the dark triad, and unethical consumer attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 123-128.
[10] Harvey, P., & Dasborough, M. T. (2015). Entitled to solutions: The need for research on workplace entitlement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 460-465.
[11] Harvey, P., & Harris, K. J. (2010). Frustration-based outcomes of entitlement and the influence of supervisor communication. Human Relations, 63(11), 1639-1660.
[12] Harvey, P., & Martinko, M. J. (2009). An empirical examination of the role of attributions in psychological entitlement and its outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 459-476.
[13] Johnson, H. H., & Umphress, E. E. (2019). To help my supervisor: Identification, moral identity, and unethical pro-supervisor behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 519-534.
[14] McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1141-1149.
[15] Mesdaghinia S., Rawat A., & Nadavulakere S. (2019). Why moral followers quit: Examining the role of leader bottom-line mentality and unethical pro-leader behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 491-505.
[16] Moore C., Detert J. R., Klebe Treviño L., Baker V. L., & Mayer D. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1-48.
[17] Moore C., Mayer D. M., Chiang F. F., Crossley C., Karlesky M. J., & Birtch T. A. (2019). Leaders matter morally: The role of ethical leadership in shaping employee moral cognition and misconduct. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 123-145.
[18] Rose, K. C., & Anastasio, P. A. (2014). Entitlement is about 'others', narcissism is not: Relations to sociotropic and autonomous interpersonal styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 50-53.
[19] Yam K. C., Barnes C. M., Leavitt K., Wei W., Lau J., & Uhlmann E. L. (2019). Why so serious? A laboratory and field investigation of the link between morality and humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(4), 758-772.
[20] Yam K. C., Christian M. S., Wei W., Liao Z. Y., & Nai J. (2018). The mixed blessing of leader sense of humor: Examining costs and benefits. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 348-369.