An Analysis of the Concept of Cultural Attachment

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240421

Abstract

Abstract: This paper reviews extant findings regarding the development of cultural attachment. We explore the concept of cultural attachment. Cultural attachment is the affective bond between individuals and their culture. Its dimensions include positive cultural evaluation, individual-culture affectivity, and direct participation in cultural activities. In addition, we explore the relationship between cultural attachment and four other relevant concepts: general attachment, cultural identity, cultural confidence, and acculturation.
Cultural attachment differs from general attachment. Cultural attachment objects include concrete groups and multiple abstract world outlooks that are culturally based. Individuals can construct multicultural attachment from a single cultural attachment state. The connection between cultural attachment and general attachment is that both of them can create a sense of security.
There are three differences between cultural attachment and cultural identity. First, cultural attachment forms through interactions and cooperation within a group. In contrast, cultural identity is formed by comparing different groups. Second, cultural symbols elicit individuals' “safe behavior” in cultural attachment, while they activate individuals' knowledge systems in cultural identity. Finally, cultural attachment usually plays a role after separation, death, and other similar situations, while cultural identity is activated irrespective of the situation. The connection between cultural attachment and cultural identity is that cultural identity is the cognitive basis of cultural attachment.
There are four differences between cultural attachment and cultural confidence. First, the emotional component of cultural attachment includes different valences of emotion. However, cultural confidence refers exclusively to positive emotions. Second, cultural attachment includes cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors, while cultural confidence comprises an individual's overall view of culture. Third, cultural attachment involves unconscious individual-cultural affective bonding. In contrast, cultural confidence is a conscious and rational process. Fourth, the formation process of cultural attachment stems from intragroup interactions, while cultural confidence includes exchange and mutual learning between two or more different cultural groups. Cultural attachment and cultural confidence are related to and generated through cultural identity. Furthermore, they have positive emotional components and serve as cultural resources to alleviate negative emotions.
Cultural attachment and acculturation are mutually reinforcing. In the early stages of cross-cultural contact, a secure attachment to the culture of one's home country can increase the willingness to contact other cultural groups. In comparison, acculturated individuals also form attachments to other cultures. This process establishes a beneficial cycle of cultural attachment and acculturation. However, cultural attachment and acculturation have different concerns. Cultural attachment emphasizes process, while acculturation emphasizes results.
Therefore, this paper offers a unique perspective by clarifying the concepts of cultural attachment. Furthermore, it expands the differences and connections between cultural attachment and other relevant concepts of general attachment, cultural identity, cultural confidence, and acculturation. This paper could help to ensure the independent status of cultural attachment studies. In addition, it provides an essential theoretical basis for the development of subsequent cultural attachment studies. Future research should focus on the development of indigenous measurement tools of cultural attachment, explore the mechanisms of cultural attachment by combining the social identity theory and the attachment theory, and expand the social value of cultural attachment.

Key words: cultural attachment, general attachment, cultural identity, cultural confidence, acculturation

摘要： 文化依恋指个体与所属文化相互作用形成的特殊情感联结。对文化依恋的内涵及其邻近概念（一般依恋、文化认同、文化自信与文化适应）的辨析有助于确保文化依恋研究的独立地位和后续研究的开展。未来研究重点应包括开发文化依恋的本土化测量工具、探究文化依恋的形成机制和拓展考察文化依恋的社会价值。

关键词: 文化依恋, 一般依恋, 文化认同, 文化自信, 文化适应

Li Yaning, Yang Yisheng, Xin Ziqiang, Liang Li, Wang Pai. An Analysis of the Concept of Cultural Attachment[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2024, 47(4): 933-939.

李雅宁, 杨伊生, 辛自强, 梁丽, 王湃. 文化依恋概念辨析^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 933-939.

References

[1] 毕重增. (2020). 文化的间距感和正念与文化自信. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 46(6), 122-129, 213.
[2] 毕重增, 吴良, 赵玉芳. (2022). 获得意义感: 文化自信对抑郁和焦虑的缓解作用. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 59(1), 89-96.
[3] 陈欣, 程振锋. (2021). 体验价值视角下红色旅游游客公民行为影响机制研究. 旅游科学, 35(6), 50-66.
[4] 陈咏媛, 韦庆旺. (2020). 流动性社会下文化自信的心理建设进路. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 56(4), 117-132.
[5] 崔新建. (2004). 文化认同及其根源. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 4, 102-104.
[6] 戴圣鹏. (2022). 论文化自信的基础与条件. 学术界, 1, 119-125.
[7] 何生海. (2021). 推广国家通用语言文字与铸牢中华民族共同体意识. 北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 6, 124-132.
[8] 李荣山. (2022). 从共生到共识: 费孝通晚年的“补课”——兼论文化自觉的文明比较维度. 学海, 1, 38-50.
[9] 李森森, 龙长权, 陈庆飞, 李红. (2010). 群际接触理论——一种改善群际关系的理论. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 831-839.
[10] 梁丽, 杨伊生, 肖前国, 利爱娟. (2019). 文化依恋的研究现状与展望. 民族教育研究, 30(2), 107-114.
[11] 刘峰, 佐斌. (2010). 群际情绪理论及其研究. 心理科学进展, 18(6), 940-947.
[12] 蒙象飞. (2016). 中国国家形象与文化符号传播. 五洲传播出版社.
[13] 邵雪莹. (2016). 文化依恋、歧视知觉、心理弹性与心理压力的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 哈尔滨工程大学.
[14] 汪舒明. (2017). 战后美国犹太组织的“群际关系运动”及其影响. 史林, 5, 194-201, 222.
[15] 杨晓莉, 马超. (2019). 从多元到聚合: 优化族群关系的新视点. 湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 37(4), 8-16.
[16] 周婷, 毕重增. (2020). 文化自信问卷的编制. 心理研究, 13(3), 214-220, 244.
[17] 佐斌, 秦向荣. (2011). 中华民族认同的心理成分和形成机制. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 40(4), 68-76.
[18] Berry J. W., Kim U., Minde T., & Mok D. (1987). Comparative studies of acculturative stress. International Migration Review, 21(3), 491-511.
[19] Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books.
[20] Cronin T. J., Pepping C. A., & O' Donovan A. (2018). Attachment to friends and psychosocial well-being: The role of emotion regulation. Clinical Psychologist, 22(2), 158-167.
[21] Fu J. H. Y., Morris M. W., & Hong Y. Y. (2015). A transformative taste of home: Home culture primes foster expatriates' adjustment through bolstering relational security. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 24-31.
[22] Graves, T. D. (1967). Psychological acculturation in a tri-ethnic community. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 23(4), 337-350.
[23] Hong Y. Y., Fang Y., Yang Y., & Phua D. Y. (2013). Cultural attachment: A new theory and method to understand cross-cultural competence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(6), 1024-1044.
[24] Hong Y. Y., Roisman G. I., & Chen J. (2006). A model of cultural attachment: A new approach for studying bicultural experience. In M. H. Bornstein & L. R. Cote (Eds.), Acculturation and parent-child relationships: Measurement and development (pp. 135-170). Routledge.
[25] Hossain, B., & Lamb, L. (2020). Cultural attachment and wellbeing among Canada' s indigenous people: A rural urban divide. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(4), 1303-1324.
[26] Hu F. W., Wang P., & Li L. J. (2014). Psychometric structure of the Chinese multiethnic adolescent cultural identity questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1356-1368.
[27] Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2018). Moving toward greater security: The effects of repeatedly priming attachment security and anxiety. Journal of Research in Personality, 74, 147-157.
[28] Pishghadam R., Hashemi M. R., & Bazri E. (2013). Specifying the underlying constructs of home culture attachment scale. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 1(1), 37-51.
[29] Routh, D. A., & Burgoyne, C. B. (1998). Being in two minds about a single currency: A UK perspective on the Euro. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(6), 741-754.
[30] Venuleo C., Gelo O. C. G., & Salvatore S. (2020). Fear, affective semiosis, and management of the pandemic crisis: COVID-19 as semiotic vaccine? Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 17(2), 117-130.
[31] Yap, W. J. (2018). Behavioural and neurobiological effects of cultural attachment (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.