The Evolution and Implications of Positive Youth Development

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240431

Abstract

Abstract: Positive Youth Development (PYD) is an integrative developmental theory that incorporates problem awareness, empirical evidence, and practical applications. PYD spans the entire developmental process, emphasizing the value of youth development from theoretical methods and principles to practical application. This study reviews the formation, background, and theoretical development of PYD, tracing its evolution from an ecological-situational orientation to a historical-cultural orientation over the past 30 years. Emphasizing the dialectical unity of history and logic, the study focuses on the philosophical and theoretical values of youth development mechanisms and practical approaches for promoting youth development. Drawing on historical context and practical experiences in China, this study explores the rich connotations and multiple implications of PYD.
The PYD paradigm represents a significant theoretical shift in the field of youth development, reshaping research and practice, and advancing global study and policy processes. PYD moves beyond the "problem perspective" and "deficit model" by focusing on the strengths and potential of youth. It emphasizes the reciprocal interaction between the individual and the context, recognizing the dynamic interactions fundamental to youth development. As a comprehensive and systematic development theory, the core of PYD lies in the positive transformation of youth epistemology and the profound understanding of development mechanisms.
The evolution of PYD from an ecological-situational orientation to a historical-cultural orientation expands our understanding of promoting positive youth development, research methods, and practical exploration. The core theoretical foundation of PYD's historical and cultural orientation is the relational developmental system (RDS), which integrates, expands, and deepens various developmental theories from ecological-situational orientations, such as ecological systems theory and developmental contextualism. RDS, as a cutting-edge theoretical framework in contemporary developmental science, emphasizes the complex dynamic mechanisms of various factors, spanning relationships from the micro-level of physiology, psychology, and behavior to the macro-level of society, culture, and history. It extends the research perspective of PYD to explore dynamic changes in the youth development process.
In recent years, PYD research has extended to different regions and countries, focusing on youths in low- and middle-income countries, and revealing diverse developmental patterns. The integration of social and cultural factors has enhanced our understanding of PYD, providing a theoretical foundation and empirical evidence for promoting youth development programs and prevention work worldwide. Thus, the fundamental positive transformation in youth epistemology formed by PYD has multiple implications for exploring ways to study and promote positive development, tapping into youth potential, and formulating and implementing education policies in China.
A comprehensive PYD research system has been established in Western countries. Based on the evolution and research experience of PYD worldwide, future PYD research should focus on cultural attributes and social realities in China, promoting the development and improvement of theoretical and applied systems of PYD. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate interdisciplinary research methods to systematically understand and effectively promote PYD development. Future research should consider the current status of youth development in China to integrate PYD into policies and practices, mobilize social resources, adopt a positive perspective toward youth, and promote their comprehensive and healthy growth.

Key words: positive youth development, social development, ecological-situational orientation, historical-cultural orientation

摘要： 积极青少年发展是发展科学理论范式的重大转变,极大推动了全球青少年发展研究和教育政策的进程。积极青少年发展突破“问题视角”和“缺陷模型”,主张关注青少年的优势和相对可塑性,强调个体与情境的互惠互动,凸显青少年之于社会进步和人类发展的贡献与方法论价值。在历经生态情境取向向历史文化取向的演进过程中,积极青少年发展研究逐步在世界范围内开展、推广和践行,彰显出鲜明的理论更新自觉和实践品格,这对推动对青少年的认识论发展、我国积极青少年发展研究以及政策制定实施,具有多重启示。

关键词: 积极青少年发展, 社会发展, 生态情境取向, 历史文化取向

Shen Lei, Zhang Yunrui, Chen Ning, Liu Wei. The Evolution and Implications of Positive Youth Development[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2024, 47(4): 1016-1023.

沈蕾, 张芸瑞, 陈宁, 刘伟. 积极青少年发展理论的演进与意涵^*[J]. 心理科学, 2024, 47(4): 1016-1023.

References

[1] 柴晓运, 林丹华. (2021). 化危为机: 青少年学校转折期的过渡. 心理科学进展, 29(5), 864-874.
[2] 常淑敏, 张文新. (2013). 人类积极发展的资源模型——积极青少年发展研究的一个重要取向和领域. 心理科学进展, 21(1), 86-95.
[3] 陈晓娟, 任俊, 马甜语. (2009). 积极心理健康的内涵解析. 心理科学, 32(2), 487-489.
[4] 崔丽娟, 张高产. (2005). 积极心理学研究综述——心理学研究的一个新思潮. 心理科学, 28(2), 402-405.
[5] 郭海英, 刘方, 刘文, 蔺秀云, 林丹华. (2017). 积极青少年发展: 理论、应用与未来展望. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 6, 5-13.
[6] 何芳. (2011). 欧美青少年文化的发展历程——评《青春无羁——狂飙时代的社会运动(1875—1945)》. 当代青年研究, 8, 77-80.
[7] 叶浩生. (2009). 心理学史. 华东师范大学出版社.
[8] 张卫, 唐丹, 岳颂华. (2003). 当代西方青少年研究趋势探析. 心理科学, 26(3), 529-530.
[9] 张文新, 陈光辉. (2009). 发展情境论——一种新的发展系统理论. 心理科学进展, 17(4), 736-744.
[10] Adams B. G., Wiium N., & Abubakar A. (2019). Developmental assets and academic performance of adolescents in Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa. Child and Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 207-222.
[11] Alvarado G., Skinner M., Plaut D., Moss C., Kapungu C., & Reavley N. (2017). A systematic review of positive youth development in low- and middle-income countries. Youth Power Learning, Making Cents International.
[12] Benson P. L., Scales P. C., Hamilton S. F., & Sesma A., Jr. (2007). Positive youth development: Theory, research, and applications. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 894-941). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
[13] Benson P. L., Scales P. C., & Syvertsen A. K. (2011). The contribution of the developmental assets framework to positive youth development theory and practice. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 41, 197-230.
[14] Bowers E. P., Geldhof G. J., Johnson S. K., Hilliard L. J., Hershberg R. M., Lerner J. V., & Lerner R. M. (2015). Promoting positive youth development: Lessons from the 4-H study. Springer.
[15] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
[16] Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793-828). John Wiley & Sons.
[17] Burkhard B. M., Robinson K. M., Murray E. D., & Lerner R. M. (2020). Positive youth development: Theory and perspective. In S. Hupp & J. Jewell (Eds.), The encyclopedia of child and adolescent development (pp. 1-12). Wiley-Blackwell.
[18] Cantor P., Osher D., Berg J., Steyer L., & Rose T. (2019). Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context. Applied Developmental Science, 23(4), 307-337.
[19] Catalano R. F., Fagan A. A., Gavin L. E., Greenberg M. T., Irwin C. E., Ross D. A., & Shek, D. T. L. (2012). Worldwide application of prevention science in adolescent health. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1653-1664.
[20] Catalano R. F., Skinner M. L., Alvarado G., Kapungu C., Reavley N., Patton G. C., & Petroni S. (2019). Positive youth development programs in low- and middle-income countries: A conceptual framework and systematic review of efficacy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(1), 15-31.
[21] Chan W. Y., Ou S. R., & Reynolds A. J. (2014). Adolescent civic engagement and adult outcomes: An examination among urban racial minorities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(11), 1829-1843.
[22] Ciocanel O., Power K., Eriksen A., & Gillings K. (2017). Effectiveness of positive youth development Interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(3), 483-504.
[23] Damon, W. (2004). What is positive youth development? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 13-24.
[24] Eichas K., Ferrer-Wreder L., & Olsson T. M. (2019). Contributions of positive youth development to intervention science. Child and Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 279-287.
[25] Eichas K., Montgomery M. J., Meca A., & Kurtines W. M. (2017). Empowering marginalized youth: A self-transformative intervention for promoting positive youth development. Child Development, 88(4), 1115-1124.
[26] Fredricks, J. A., & Simpkins, S. D. (2012). Promoting positive youth development through organized after-School activities: Taking a closer look at participation of ethnic minority youth. Child Development Perspectives, 6(3), 280-287.
[27] Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education. Appleton.
[28] Hope, E., & Spencer, M. (2017). Civic engagement as an adaptive coping response to conditions of inequality: An application of phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST). Handbook on positive development of minority children and youth (pp. 421-435). Springer.
[29] Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 1-17). John Wiley & Sons.
[30] Lerner R. M., Agans J. P., Desouza L. M., & Hershberg R. M. (2014). Developmental science in 2025: A predictive review. Research in Human Development, 11(4), 255-272.
[31] Lerner R. M., Boyd M. J., Kiely M. K., Napolitano C. M., Schmid K. L., & Steinberg L. (2011). The history of the study of adolescence. Encyclopedia of Adolescence, 1, 169-176.
[32] Lerner R. M., Brindis C. D., Batanova M., & Blum R. W. (2018). Adolescent health development: A relational developmental systems perspective. In N. Halfon, C. B. Forrest, R. M. Lerner, & E. M. Faustman (Eds.), Handbook of life course health development (pp. 109-122). Springer.
[33] Lerner, R. M., & Castellino, D. R. (2002). Contemporary developmental theory and adolescence: Developmental systems and applied developmental science. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(6), 122-135.
[34] Lerner, R. M., & Chase, P. A. (2019). Enhancing theory and methodology in the international study of positive youth development: A commentary. Child and Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 269-277.
[35] Lerner, R. M., & Galambos, N. L. (1998). Adolescent development: Challenges and opportunities for research, programs, and policies. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 413-446.
[36] Lerner R. M., Lerner J. V., Bowers E. P., & Geldhof G. J. (2015). Positive youth development and relational-developmental-systems. In W. F. Overton, P. C. Molenaar, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method (pp. 607-651). John Wiley & Sons.
[37] Lerner R. M., Tirrell J. M., Dowling E. M., Geldhof G. J., Gestsdóttir S., Lerner J. V., & Sim, A. T. R. (2019). The end of the beginning: Evidence and absences studying positive youth development in a global context. Adolescent Research Review, 4(1), 1-14.
[38] Lin, L., & Shek, D. T. L. (2019). Positive youth development. In D. T. L. Shek & J. T. Y. Leung (Eds.), Advancing responsible adolescent development (pp. 1-11). Wiley.
[39] Moore, K. A. (2017). Commentary: Positive youth development goes mainstream. Child Development, 88(4), 1175-1177.
[40] Ng F. F. Y., Pomerantz E. M., & Deng C. P. (2014). Why are Chinese mothers more controlling than American mothers? “My child is my report card”. Child Development, 85(1), 355-369.
[41] Overton, W. F. (2013). A new paradigm for developmental science: Relationism and relational-developmental systems. Applied Developmental Science, 17(2), 94-107.
[42] Overton, W. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational-developmental-systems. In W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 1: Theory and method (pp. 9-62). John Wiley & Sons.
[43] Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 279-298). Springer.
[44] Shek D. T. L., Zhao L., Dou D. Y., Zhu X. Q., & Xiao C. H. (2021). The impact of positive youth development attributes on posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among Chinese adolescents under COVID-19. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(4), 676-682.
[45] Telzer E. H., van Hoorn J., Rogers C. R., & Do K. T. (2018). Chapter seven—Social influence on positive youth development: A developmental neuroscience perspective. In J. B. Benson (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 215-258). Elsevier.
[46] Tirrell J. M., Geldhof G. J., King P. E., Dowling E. M., Sim A. T. R., Williams K., & Lerner R. M. (2019). Measuring spirituality, hope, and thriving among Salvadoran youth: Initial findings from the compassion international study of positive youth development. Child and Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 241-268.
[47] Waid, J., & Uhrich, M. (2020). A scoping review of the theory and practice of positive youth development. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(1), 5-24.
[48] Wiium N., Dost-Gözkan A., & Kosic M. (2019). Developmental assets among young people in three European contexts: Italy, Norway and Turkey. Child and Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 187-206.
[49] Williams, J. L., & Deutsch, N. L. (2016). Beyond between-group differences: Considering race, ethnicity, and culture in research on positive youth development programs. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 203-213.
[50] Worthman, C. M., & Trang, K. (2018). Dynamics of body time, social time and life history at adolescence. Nature, 2018(7693), 451-457.
[51] Zhu, X. Q., & Shek, D. T. L. (2020). Impact of a positive youth development program on junior high school students in mainland China: A pioneer study. Children and Youth Services Review, 114, Article 105022.