›› 2020, Vol. ›› Issue (6): 1391-1397.

• 社会、人格与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

自主欺骗决策过程与结果评价的ERPs研究

聂衍刚,彭小燕,窦凯,马祎晨   

  1. 广州大学
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-16 修回日期:2020-04-22 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2021-01-03
  • 通讯作者: 窦凯

An ERPs Study of Spontaneous Deceptive Decision-making Process and Outcome Evaluation Process

  • Received:2019-09-16 Revised:2020-04-22 Online:2020-11-15 Published:2021-01-03
  • Contact: Kai DOU

摘要: 本研究基于事件相关电位技术,以32名大学生为研究对象,采用2(诱发条件:高奖赏、低奖赏)×3(反馈类型:欺骗成功、欺骗失败、诚实)的组内实验设计,以点判断任务操控被试的自主欺骗水平,并结合欺骗及时反馈范式来操纵被试的结果评价。结果发现:(1)在决策过程,做出欺骗决策比诚实决策诱发更大波幅的P300;(2)在结果评价过程,相比欺骗成功反馈和诚实反馈,欺骗失败反馈诱发更负的FRN波幅。结果显示个体做出欺骗决策比诚实决策需要更多的注意资源参与和心理努力,并且对欺骗失败反馈的敏感度远高于欺骗成功反馈和诚实反馈。这一定程度上揭示了个体做出欺骗决策和面对欺骗结果时的心理和神经机制,为教育者采取必要措施来降低和预防青少年欺骗行为奠定了研究基础。

关键词: 自主欺骗, 决策加工, 结果评价, P300, FRN

Abstract: Previous studies have investigated the executive control process of deceptive behavior. There is a relative lack of electrophysiological mechanism of spontaneous deception of adolescents from the perspective of decision-making processing. Combined with event-related potential (ERPs), this study used dots task and timely feedback paradigm to explore the intrinsic mechanism of adolescents' spontaneous deception. In this study, 34 college students were selected as paid volunteers, of which 2 were due to artifacts seriously, processing data were excluded, finally got 32 effective participants (14 girls, average age 20.22 ±1.58). In this experiment, the dots task was used to control the level of spontaneous deception of the participates, and timely feedback paradigm was used to manipulate the outcome evaluation of the participates. In the experimental task, 20 black spots were randomly arranged in the left and right boxes of the computer screen(13: 7, 14: 6 , 15: 5), and the corresponding integral values (10, 20, 100) were presented. It is possible that the participants will get a corresponding integral value when they choose a box. The computer will give feedback on the outcome after each choice, including failed deception, successful deception and honesty. The participates were told that they could only withdraw from the experiment if they had accumulated 10,000 integral values. Meanwhile, participants' EEGs were recorded by a 64-channel ERPs equipment while they were taking the experimental task. In the decision-making process, the resulting amplitudes of P300 were entered into 2 elicited conditions (high reward, low reward) × 2 reactions (honesty, deception) ANOVAs for repeated measures. In the outcome evaluation process, FRN amplitude were entered into 2 elicited conditions (high reward, low reward) × 3 feedback types ( failed deception, successful deception, honesty) ANOVAs for repeated measures. ERPs analysis revealed that the main effect of deceptive reaction type was significant, (F (126) = 10.73, p <0.01, η2 ≤0.29), that is, deceptive decision-making elicited more higher amplitude of P300 than honest decision-making (Mdeceptive=2.79±0.49μV; Mhonest=1.67±0.55μV). The main effect of outcome evaluation type was significant, (F (250) = 10.63, p < 0.01, η2≤0.30), compared with successful deception feedback and honest feedback, failed deception feedback elicited more negative FRN (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in FRN elicited by successful deception feedback and honest feedback(Msuccessful deception=-3.08±0.75μV; Mfailed deception=-6.69±1.09μV; Mhonest=-3.06±0.75μV). These results revealed that individuals who make deceptive decision require more attention resource and mental efforts than honest decisions. Compared with successful deception feedback and honest feedback, they are more sensitive to failed deception feedback. It’s not only help to better understand the dynamic mechanism of adolescents spontaneous deception, but also lays a research foundation for educators to take necessary measures to reduce and prevent the deceptive behavior of adolescents.

Key words: spontaneous deception, decision-making process, outcome evaluation, P300, FRN