疫情聚焦对幸福感的影响：关系自我的保护作用*

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230624

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 疫情爆发给人们带来了持久的心理压力,影响公众的幸福感。本文采用启动范式探讨疫情防控常态化后疫情聚焦对幸福感的影响及自我建构的调节作用,结果显示：疫情聚焦降低幸福感,特质性关系自我调节疫情聚焦与快乐感的关系,缓冲了疫情的消极作用;状态性关系自我对幸福感及其子维度的提升作用不受聚焦疫情的影响。在应对疫情时,充分利用自我建构中与关系自我相关联的心理资源可增强人们对疫情信息的免疫,维护幸福感。

关键词: 疫情, 幸福感, 自我建构, 关系自我

Abstract:

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic is a major social disaster that led to stress reactions that negatively affect the mind and body, causing lasting psychological stress and reducing well-being. Even after entering the regular phase of pandemic prevention and control, the negative impact on mental health and well-being continues due to the uncertainty of the pandemic development. In this paper, we use Oishi's three-dimensional model of well-being to understand the breadth of the impact of the pandemic on well-being. That is, the impact of the pandemic on well-being will be reflected in the three sub-dimensions of happiness, meaningfulness, and psychological richness. In addition, studies have shown the influence of self-construal of happiness and environmental congruence. Individuals with different dominant self-construal orientations have different access to psychological resources when coping with the pandemic, which in turn affects their coping outcomes with pandemic stress. Thus, the interaction between individual self-construal and the pandemic can result in different changes in well-being. In summary, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of pandemic focus on well-being and the moderating effect of self-construal.

Study 1 used a one-way between-subjects experimental design to manipulate individuals'attention to pandemic information to explore the effect of pandemic focus on well-being and to verify the moderating role of self-construal between pandemic focus and well-being by measuring individuals'self-construal orientation. We collected experimental data from 119 subjects (41 males and 78 females) in an online experiment. The results showed that (1) Pandemic focus reduce individuals'well-being and is reflected in all three dimensions of well-being. (2) Relational self-construal moderates the relationship between pandemic and happiness and can buffer the negative effects of pandemic. However, the moderating effect found in Study 1 occurred at the trait level, and the relational self-construal was a measurement variable rather than a manipulation variable. Therefore, the definite relationship between the moderating effect of the relational self-construal on pandemic focus and happiness needs to be further demonstrated.

Study 2 focused on the protective mechanism of the relational self on happiness by using a 2 (pandemic focus, control group) × 2 (relational-self priming, control group) between-subjects experimental design to manipulate the pandemic focus and the relational self, respectively, to explore their causal relationship with happiness by activating the relational self. We collected experimental data from 203 subjects (59 males and 144 females) in an online experiment. The results showed that activation of the relational self enhanced individuals'well-being regardless of whether they focused on the pandemic or not. People's perception of information about the pandemic can have a lasting and widespread negative impact on well-being, but the relational self can buffer the negative effects of the pandemic and maintain individuals'well-being. In addition, this positive benefit can further flood into individuals'daily life.

These findings have important practical implications for public psychological protection under the pandemic. Under the regular phase of pandemic prevention and control, firstly, reducing the attention to pandemic information can avoid the loss of individual happiness. Second, individuals should be aware of the preventability and controllability of the pandemic from a rational and objective perspective, and pay attention to their personal pandemic prevention behaviors to increase their immunity to pandemic information. Finally, individuals are able to use the relationship to construct the adaptability in culture and context, such as increasing the importance of interpersonal relationship, deriving positive benefits from it as a way to enhance the overall level of well-being.

Key words: the COVID-19 pandemic, happiness, self-construction, relational self

卫朝选, 王磊, 许粟榬, 毕重增. 疫情聚焦对幸福感的影响：关系自我的保护作用^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1462-1469.

Wei Chaoxuan, Wang Lei, Xu Suyuan, Bi Chongzeng. COVID-19 and Happiness:The Protective Effect of Relational Self[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2023, 46(6): 1462-1469.

参考文献

[1] 陈昌凯, 肖心月, 张保军, 黄皓明. (2010). 灾难性事件对幸福感的“积极”影响. 心理科学进展, 18(7), 1104-1109.
[2] 刘鑫雨, 刘电芝, 赵源, 彭文波. (2020). 新冠肺炎疫情期间负性情绪的减缓发展:控制策略的调节作用. 社区心理学研究, 10, 30-45.
[3] 刘艳. (2011). 自我建构研究的现状与展望. 心理科学进展, 19(3), 427-439.
[4] 刘子旻, 时勘, 万金, 陈晨. (2018). 认知闭合需要研究梳理与未来走向. 心理科学进展, 26(4), 688-697.
[5] 王进, 李强. (2019). 当代中国人的三重自我及“混融自我”. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 40(5), 215-221.
[6] 吴胜涛, 王力, 周明洁, 王文忠, 张建新. (2009). 灾区民众的公正观与幸福感及其与非灾区的比较. 心理科学进展, 17(3), 579-587.
[7] 席居哲, 佘壮, 鞠康, 赵婧婧, 侯湘铃, 彭雅楠, 左志宏. (2020). 新冠肺炎疫情风险感知量表的编制和效度验证. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 4, 131-141.
[8] 张本钰, 叶源, 金君敏, 林丽华. (2020). 新冠肺炎疫情防控不同阶段福建省大学生心理健康状况. 中国学校卫生, 41(12), 1896-1899.
[9] 赵树宽, 邵东, 王泷, 李师萌, 李佳逸. (2020). 新冠肺炎疫情对吉林省企业的影响及对策建议——基于对吉林省336家企业的问卷调查. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 60(5), 60-70, 236.
[10] 中华预防医学会新型冠状病毒肺炎防控专家组. (2020). 新型冠状病毒肺炎流行病学特征的最新认识. 中国病毒病杂志, 10(2), 86-92.
[11] Ahorsu D. K., Lin C. Y., Imani V., Saffari M., Griffiths M. D., & Pakpour A. H. (2022). The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(3), 1537-1545.
[12] Appel M., Gnambs T., & Maio G. R. (2012). A short measure of the need for affect. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(4), 418-426.
[13] Badahdah A., Khamis F., Al Mahyijari N., Al Balushi M., Al Hatmi H., Al Salmi I., & Al Noomani J. (2021). The mental health of health care workers in Oman during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(1), 90-95.
[14] Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83-93.
[15] Brooks S. K., Webster R. K., Smith L. E., Woodland L., Wessely S., Greenberg N., & Rubin G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912-920.
[16] Corvo, E., & De Caro, W. (2020). COVID-19 and spontaneous singing to decrease loneliness, improve cohesion, and mental well-being: An Italian experience. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S247-S248.
[17] Cross S. E., Bacon P. L., & Morris M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 791-808.
[18] Cross S. E., Hardin E. E., & Gercek-Swing B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142-179.
[19] Cross, S. E., & Morris, M. L. (2003). Getting to know you: The relational self-construal, relational cognition, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 512-523.
[20] Di Santo D., Chernikova M., Kruglanski A. W., & Pierro A. (2020). Does inconsistency always lead to negative affect? The influence of need for closure on affective reactions to cognitive inconsistency. International Journal of Psychology, 55(5), 882-890.
[21] Diener E., Oishi S., & Lucas R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403-425.
[22] Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678-686.
[23] Galang C. M., Johnson D., & Obhi S. S. (2021). Exploring the relationship between empathy, self-construal style, and self-reported social distancing tendencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 588934.
[24] Gao J. L., Zheng P. P., Jia Y. N., Chen H., Mao Y. M., Chen S. H., & Dai J. M. (2020). Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS ONE, 15(4), Article e0231924.
[25] Kamara S., Walder A., Duncan J., Kabbedijk A., Hughes P., & Muana A. (2017). Mental health care during the Ebola virus disease outbreak in Sierra Leone. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(12), 842-847.
[26] Kashima, E. S., & Hardie, E. A. (2000). The development and validation of the Relational, Individual, and Collective self-aspects (RIC) Scale. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 19-48.
[27] Li S. J., Wang Y. L., Xue J., Zhao N., & Zhu T. S. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: A study on active Weibo users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), Article 2032.
[28] Lutz A., Slagter H. A., Dunne J. D., & Davidson R. J. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 163-169.
[29] Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 583-614.
[30] Oishi S., Choi H., Buttrick N., Heintzelman S. J., Kushlev K., Westgate E. C., & Besser L. L. (2019). The psychologically rich life questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 257-270.
[31] Oishi S., Choi H., Koo M., Galinha I., Ishii K., Komiya A., & Besser L. L. (2020). Happiness, meaning, and psychological richness. Affective Science, 1(2), 107-115.
[32] Oishi, S., & Westgate, E. C. (2022). A psychologically rich life: Beyond happiness and meaning. Psychological Review. 129(4), 790-811.
[33] Prime H., Wade M., & Browne D. T. (2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 75(5), 631-643.
[34] Roets A., Kruglanski A. W., Kossowska M., Pierro A., & Hong Y. Y. (2015). The motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 221-283.
[35] Roets, A., & van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90-94.
[36] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-166.
[37] Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397-423.
[38] Triandis H. C.(1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press..
[39] Tu K. C., Chen S. S., & Mesler R. M. (2021). Trait self-construal, inclusion of others in the self and self-control predict stay-at-home adherence during COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, Article 110687.
[40] van Bavel J. J., Baicker K., Boggio P. S., Capraro V., Cichocka A., Cikara M., & Willer R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460-471.
[41] Wang J., Wang Z., Liu X. J., Yang X. F., Zheng M. L., & Bai X. J. (2021). The impacts of a COVID-19 epidemic focus and general belief in a just world on individual emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 168(1), Article 110349.
[42] Waters, L. (2020). Using positive psychology interventions to strengthen family happiness: A family systems approach. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(5), 645-652.
[43] Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062.
[44] Xiao, C. F. (2020). A novel approach of consultation on 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)-related psychological and mental problems: Structured letter therapy. Psychiatry Investigation, 17(2), 175-176.
[45] Yang, H. Y., & Ma, J. J. (2020). How an epidemic outbreak impacts happiness: Factors that worsen (vs. protect) emotional Well-being during the coronavirus pandemic. Psychiatry Research, 289, Article 113045.

疫情聚焦对幸福感的影响：关系自我的保护作用^*

COVID-19 and Happiness:The Protective Effect of Relational Self

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	孙五俊, 姜媛, 方平. 目标冲突能否有益幸福?意义寻求与体验的链式中介作用 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1391-1398.
[2]	周迎楠, 王俊秀. 使用社交媒体发布动态的频率对青年群体主观幸福感的影响：基本心理需要满足的中介作用 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1454-1461.
[3]	鞠佳雯, 周欣然, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 父母参与的一致性与儿童主观幸福感的关系——基于多项式回归的响应面分析^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1478-1485.
[4]	孟可强, 李凤兰, 王丽, 陈敏. 童年社会经济地位与农村成年居民心理健康：希望感和主观幸福感的作用 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1148-1155.
[5]	邓小惠向燕辉. 婚姻是幸福的坟墓吗？ ——基于中国家庭追踪调查的双重差分倾向得分匹配法的估计[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(3): 635-643.
[6]	王歆睿韩布新. 基于微信平台的研究生积极心理干预[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(1): 230-237.
[7]	王维超赵玉芳肖子伦陈冰. 自我建构对内群体、外群体参照效应的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(6): 1407-1413.
[8]	周菡李冠军朱卓影. 新冠肺炎疫情下的评估、应对与抑郁和焦虑的关系：多元多重中介模型[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 695-701.
[9]	陈美芬张敏陈蕾贺赫蒋柯查抒佚. 长时间相处是亲子关系的保护性因素吗？--疫情背景下基于微博大数据的质性分析[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 687-694.
[10]	朱芬梁钧华麻彦坤. 现实利他行为与网络利他行为对大学生主观幸福感的影响：多重中介模型[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 628-634.
[11]	杨彩霞王露莼张竞扬王伟皮忠玲李西营. 基于日常事件的情绪标注任务对老年人主观生活质量的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(2): 331-338.
[12]	吴明证李阳王洁刘鸿业孙晓玲. 家庭仪式与大学生幸福感的关系：社会联结与自我控制的链式中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2021, 44(6): 1346-1353.
[13]	李松陈旭冉光明张琪. 新时代青少年羞怯对同伴侵害的影响：依存型和独立型自我建构的作用[J]. 心理科学, 2021, 44(4): 822-828.
[14]	彭坚邹艳春康勇军张旭. 参与型领导对员工幸福感的双重影响：感知同事支持的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2021, 44(4): 873-880.
[15]	曾练平王语嫣曾垂凯黄亚夫赵守盈. 工作自主性对中小学教师幸福感的影响：工作重塑与工作家庭平衡的链式中介效应[J]. 心理科学, 2021, 44(3): 705-712.