心理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 200-206.

• 社会﹑人格与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

人格差异性的进化心理学解释

贺金波1,罗伟建1,徐清风1,郭永玉2   

  1. 1. 华中师范大学心理学院
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院暨青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-01 修回日期:2015-04-22 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2016-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 郭永玉

The explanation of personality differences from the perspective of evolutionary psychology

  • Received:2014-11-01 Revised:2015-04-22 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-01-20

摘要: 进化心理学一直热衷于人格共同性的探讨,但一些研究者也认为应该关注人格差异性,因为共同性和差异性是人格必不可分的两面。对人格差异性的进化解释比较成熟的有三种:生活历史理论、基因多样性理论和代价信号理论。生活历史理论认为是不同的环境(稳定和不稳定),造成了不同的生活历史策略(K策略和R策略),人格特质差异是这些策略的进化产物。基因多样性理论主要从基因突变和平衡选择的角度来解释人格差异性。前者强调突变基因的不可避免性引发了个性差异的存在和发展;后者强调概率的调节作用,解释了不同人格特质之所以能够并行存在的原因。代价信号理论则认为是个体拥有的先天禀赋或者资源差距导致其传递信号的能力差异,从而选择了不同的行为策略。未来研究需要加大遗传学、神经科学等方面的力度,以及研究范式的创新。

关键词: 人格差异性, 进化心理学, 解释

Abstract: Personality, from an evolutionary perspective, represents a meta-category of the output of a suite of species-typical, relatively domain-specific, evolved psychological mechanisms designed in response to the social adaptive problems recurrently faced by our ancestors. This conceptualization of human personality provides for novel and valuable reinterpretations of several areas of personality psychology including personality consistency, individual differences in personality, sex differences and similarities, and contextual determinants of personality. The personality commonality has always been discussed in evolutionary psychology, but some researchers hold that the personality differences also need to be focused because commonality and differences are two inseparable sides of personality. The founder of the personality psychology, Allport has put forward common traits and personal traits for a very long time, underlying the dual nature of personality: the commonality and diversity. And he paid much attention on the difference between personal traits and personality diversity, on the basis of distinguishing personality traits into cardinal traits, central traits, secondary traits, while early evolutionary psychologists focus on common traits with their thoughts that is the major products or byproducts and personal traits is the accessory during the evolution process. However, more and more evidence from evolutionary psychology researches suggest that the diversity of personality is not the supplementary, but the necessity with reasonable background and rationality. Thus, theories to explain the diverse personality have come up. The evolutionary explanations to personality differences can be divided into three categories: Life-history Theory, Genetic Diversity Theory and Costly Signaling Theory. Life-history Theory considers that personality differences are the product of the evolution of different life and history strategies (strategy K and strategy R) resulted from different environments (stable and unstable). Genetic Diversity Theory explains the personality differences from the perspective of gene mutation and balancing selection. The former emphasizes on the “contending and confrontation” between mutant gene and natural selection, and the remaining mutant gene provides the basis of personality differences; the latter contains two aspects-Frequency-dependent Selection and Environmental Heterogeneity in Fitness Optima, whose commonality stresses the “harmony and friendship” between mutant gene and natural selection and whose difference is: Frequency-dependent Selection means that there are many existent and progenitive strategies in the same context and a variety of selection strategies will retain at last because their adaptive value will be overturned by the change of proportion of each strategy in the group; Environmental Heterogeneity in Fitness Optima is that the partial existent and progenitive strategies lie in each natural environment. In all, selection strategy, to some extent, can maintain the diversity. Costly Signaling Theory holds that everyone has the motivation to transfer the signal to the outside world, which can present one’s gender, age, health, fertility, social status and gene quality, but due to the different ranks of transferring signals resulted from the natural endowment or resources differences, which drives individual to choose different behavioral strategies. The research in the future needs to focus on three directions: (1) to reinforce the research on genetics; (2) to increase the evidence from physiology research, especially the brain science; (3) to innovate the research methods and to overcome the three logic flaws of the current research paradigms.

Key words: personality differences, evolutionary psychology, explanation