大学生复杂性创伤后应激障碍的网络结构及其性别差异研究*

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.202304030

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解大学生复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的结构特征及其性别差异,采用国际创伤问卷调查了813位大学生。网络分析结果发现回避想法、高警觉和失败感是CPTSD网络中心性最高的症状,男女网络整体连通性之间没有显著差异,但个别症状的局部连通性及其中心性排序存在较大差异。在男生中,高警觉、难以保持亲密感情是中心性最高的症状;在女生中,回避想法、失败感和难以保持亲密感情是中心性最高的症状;无价值感和失败感的局部连通性在男女之间的差异较大。这些结果拓展了以往CPTSD的性别差异研究,说明了CPTSD的网络结构存在性别差异。在具体的CPTSD干预中,可以将回避想法和失败感作为女大学生的靶点症状进行干预,将高警觉作为男大学生的靶点症状进行干预。

关键词: CPTSD, 网络分析, 性别差异, 大学生

Abstract: Prior studies have suggested that college students always report multiple traumatic experiences, such as childhood traumatic experiences (e.g. abuse and neglect). Suffering from these experiences may lead to negative psychological outcomes, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorders, and complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). These outcomes, CPTSD in particular, may continue to exist for many years or lifetime for traumatized college students. The aim of this study was to examine college students' CPTSD and compare gender differences in its structure by using network analysis.
To be specific, CPTSD is expected to occur after exposure to prolonged and repeated interpersonal traumatic events. Its symptoms include not only the core symptoms of PTSD (e.g., re-experience, avoidance and sense of threat), but also three symptoms of disturbance in self-organization (DSO), including affective dysregulation, disturbances in relationships, and negative self-concept. The impact of gender on CPTSD is controversial, and relevant research is confined to the comparison of the incidence or severity of CPTSD, but few studies have focused on the differences in its inherent symptoms and their connectivity. To understand the structural characteristics of CPTSD among college students and potential gender differences, this study used the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) to evaluate CPTSD among 813 college students, and used the method of network analysis.
First, the CPTSD symptom network of college students was constructed and the centrality of each symptom was estimated. It was found that internal reminders, being on guard and failure were the most strongly connected symptoms of the CPTSD network among college students. Second, the CPTSD symptom networks of male and female college students were constructed and the centrality of each symptom was estimated. It was found that being on guard and difficulty in staying close to others were the most strongly connected symptoms in males, whereas internal reminders, failure and difficulty in staying close to others were the most strongly connected symptoms in females. In addition, the network comparison test was conducted on the CPTSD symptom networks of male and female college students. The results found that there was no significant difference in the overall network connectivity between males and females, but there were significant differences in the local connectivity of individual symptoms, among which sense of worthlessness and failure were the most. These results, on the one hand, expand previous studies on gender differences in CPTSD, indicating that there are gender differences in the network structure of CPTSD. On the other hand, results also provide inspiration for clinical intervention. That is, the differences in CPTSD network structure between male and female students can prompt us to intervene in CPTSD. In college students, internal reminders and sense of failure are used as target symptoms for females to intervene; being on guard is used as target symptoms for males to intervene.

Key words: CPTSD, network analysis, gender differences, college students, childhood trauma

徐子纯, 依拉木江·阿布都艾尼, 孙睿, 周宵. 大学生复杂性创伤后应激障碍的网络结构及其性别差异研究^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 1008-1016.

Xu Zichun, Yilamujiang Abuduaini, Sun Rui, Zhou Xiao. Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in College Students: Examining Network Structure and Gender Differences[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2023, 46(4): 1008-1016.

参考文献

[1] 蔡玉清, 董书阳, 袁帅, 胡传鹏. (2020). 变量间的网络分析模型及其应用. 心理科学进展, 28(1), 178-190.
[2] 邵宁, 马玄, 宋先兵, 何婷婷, 万宇辉. (2018). 童年期虐待与医科大学生心理亚健康的关联性研究. 现代预防医学, 45(11), 2004-2008.
[3] 田雨馨, 伍新春, 陈杰灵, 王文超. (2019). 复杂性创伤后应激障碍: 概念、评估、成因及干预. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 5, 24-36.
[4] Bolger K. E., Patterson C. J., & Kupersmidt J. B. (1998). Peer relationships and self-esteem among children who have been maltreated. Child Development, 69(4), 1171-1197.
[5] Borsboom, D. (2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 5-13.
[6] Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91-121.
[7] Brewin C. R., Cloitre M., Hyland P., Shevlin M., Maercker A., Bryant R. A., & Reed G. M. (2017). A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 1-15.
[8] Bringmann L. F., Elmer T., Epskamp S., Krause R. W., Schoch D., Wichers M., & Snippe E. (2019). What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(8), 892-903.
[9] Browne, C., & Winkelman, C. (2007). The effect of childhood trauma on later psychological adjustment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(6), 684-697.
[10] Choi K. W., Batchelder A. W., Ehlinger P. P., Safren S. A., & O'Cleirigh C. (2017). Applying network analysis to psychological comorbidity and health behavior: Depression, PTSD, and sexual risk in sexual minority men with trauma histories. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(12), 1158-1170.
[11] Cloitre M., Hyland P., Bisson J. I., Brewin C. R., Roberts N. P., Karatzias T., & Shevlin M. (2019). ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder and complex posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: A population-based study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32(6), 833-842.
[12] Cloitre M., Shevlin M., Brewin C. R., Bisson J. I., Roberts N. P., Maercker A., & Hyland P. (2018). The international trauma questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 138(6), 536-546.
[13] Dusek, J. B., & Flaherty, J. F. (1981). The development of the self-concept during the adolescent years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46(4), 1-61.
[14] Dvir Y., Ford J. D., Hill M., & Frazier J. A. (2014). Childhood maltreatment, emotional dysregulation, and psychiatric comorbidities. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 22(3), 149-161.
[15] Epskamp S., Borsboom D., & Fried E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195-212.
[16] Epskamp S., Cramer A. O. J., Waldorp L. J., Schmittmann V. D., & Borsboom D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1-18.
[17] Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 20-35.
[18] Foa E. B., Steketee G., & Rothbaum B. O. (1989). Behavioral/cognitive conceptualizations of post-traumatic stress disorder. Behavior Therapy, 20(2), 155-176.
[19] Haselgruber A., Knefel M., Sölva K., & Lueger-Schuster B. (2021). Foster children's complex psychopathology in the context of cumulative childhood trauma: The interplay of ICD-11 complex PTSD, dissociation, depression, and emotion regulation. Journal of Affective Disorders, 282, 372-380.
[20] Ho G. W. K., Hyland P., Shevlin M., Chien W. T., Inoue S., Yang P. J., & Karatzias T. (2020). The validity of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in East Asian cultures: Findings with young adults from China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Taiwan. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 11, Article 1717826.
[21] Ho G. W. K., Karatzias T., Cloitre M., Chan A. C. Y., Bressington D., Chien W. T., & Shevlin M. (2019). Translation and validation of the Chinese ICD-11 international trauma questionnaire (ITQ) for the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD). European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 10(1), Article 1608718.
[22] Hofmann S. G., Curtiss J., & McNally R. J. (2016). A complex network perspective on clinical science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 597-605.
[23] Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. CA: Sage.
[24] Hourani L., Williams J., Bray R., & Kandel D. (2015). Gender differences in the expression of PTSD symptoms among active duty military personnel. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 29, 101-108.
[25] Hyland P., Murphy J., Shevlin M., Vallières F., McElroy E., Elklit A., & Cloitre M. (2017). Variation in post-traumatic response: The role of trauma type in predicting ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD symptoms. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52(6), 727-736.
[26] Hyland P., Shevlin M., Brewin C. R., Cloitre M., Downes A. J., Jumbe S., & Roberts N. P. (2017). Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the international trauma questionnaire. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 136(3), 313-322.
[27] Karatzias T., Shevlin M., Fyvie C., Grandison G., Garozi M., Latham E., & Hyland P. (2020). Adverse and benevolent childhood experiences in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD): Implications for trauma-focused therapies. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 11(1), Article 1793599.
[28] Karatzias T., Shevlin M., Fyvie C., Hyland P., Efthymiadou E., Wilson D., & Cloitre M. (2017). Evidence of distinct profiles of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and Complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) based on the new ICD-11 trauma questionnaire (ICD-TQ). Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 181-187.
[29] Kim, J., & Cicchetti, D. (2006). Longitudinal trajectories of self-system processes and depressive symptoms among maltreated and nonmaltreated children. Child Development, 77(3), 624-639.
[30] King M. W., Street A. E., Gradus J. L., Vogt D. S., & Resick P. A. (2013). Gender differences in posttraumatic stress symptoms among OEF/OIF veterans: An item response theory analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26(2), 175-183.
[31] Knefel M., Lueger-Schuster B., Bisson J., Karatzias T., Kazlauskas E., & Roberts N. P. (2020). A cross-cultural comparison of ICD-11 complex posttraumatic stress disorder symptom networks in Austria, the United Kingdom, and Lithuania. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 33(1), 41-51.
[32] McElroy E., Shevlin M., Murphy S., Roberts B., Makhashvili N., Javakhishvili J., & Hyland P. (2019). ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: Structural validation using network analysis. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 236-237.
[33] McNally, R. J. (2017). Networks and nosology in posttraumatic stress disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(2), 124-125.
[34] Negele A., Kaufhold J., Kallenbach L., & Leuzinger-Bohleber M. (2015). Childhood trauma and its relation to chronic depression in adulthood. Depression Research and Treatment, 2015, Article 650804.
[35] Olff M., Langeland W., Draijer N., & Gersons, B. P. R. (2007). Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 183-204.
[36] Perkonigg A., Höfler M., Cloitre M., Wittchen H. U., Trautmann S., & Maercker A. (2016). Evidence for two different ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorders in a community sample of adolescents and young adults. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 266(4), 317-328.
[37] Robinaugh D. J., Millner A. J., & McNally R. J. (2016). Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(6), 747-757.
[38] Simon N., Roberts N., Lewis C., van Gelderen M., & Bisson J. I. (2019). Associations between perceived social support, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD): Implications for treatment. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 10(1), Article 1573129.
[39] Tamres L. K., Janicki D., & Helgeson V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 2-30.
[40] Tolin, D. F., & Foa, E. B. (2006). Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: A quantitative review of 25 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 959-992.
[41] van Borkulo, C. D. (2016). NetworkComparisonTest: Statistical comparison of two networks based on three invariance measures. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/NetworkComparisonTest/index.html
[42] Wolf E. J., Miller M. W., Kilpatrick D., Resnick H. S., Badour C. L., Marx B. P., & Friedman M. J. (2015). ICD-11 Complex PTSD in US national and veteran samples: Prevalence and structural associations with PTSD. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(2), 215-229.

大学生复杂性创伤后应激障碍的网络结构及其性别差异研究^*

Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in College Students: Examining Network Structure and Gender Differences

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王子豪, 杨海波. 不同性别大学生网络游戏成瘾、焦虑与抑郁的症状网络差异^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 999-1007.
[2]	邓小惠向燕辉. 婚姻是幸福的坟墓吗？ ——基于中国家庭追踪调查的双重差分倾向得分匹配法的估计[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(3): 635-643.
[3]	万雨霞焦丹阳张莉刘春雨王言胡晓倩王美萍. 父母教养行为与青少年早期抑郁的关系：多基因与负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(1): 203-211.
[4]	王浩俞国良. 恋爱中大学生依恋焦虑与心理健康的关系：恋爱关系质量的中介和调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1092-1098.
[5]	黄顺森罗玉晗来枭雄简可雯徐梓婧王耘. 中国青少年抑郁的核心症状及性别、抑郁程度间的比较：基于网络分析方法[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1115-1122.
[6]	王琼亓伊静胡伟陈慧玲. 社会拒绝与大学生抑郁情绪的关系：情绪觉察的中介作用和微信亲子沟通的调节作用 [J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1159-1165.
[7]	郝娜崔佳蕾吴琴邹何辉崔丽莹. 想象性群际接触对合作行为的影响：内隐性别偏见的中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(4): 918-925.
[8]	李永占. 暴力视频游戏接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(4): 888-895.
[9]	曾子豪胡义秋彭丽仪詹林刘双金欧阳晓优丁道群黎志华. 负性生活事件对大学生抑郁的影响：网络成瘾的中介与5-HTR1A基因rs749098多态性的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 599-606.
[10]	朱芬梁钧华麻彦坤. 现实利他行为与网络利他行为对大学生主观幸福感的影响：多重中介模型[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(3): 628-634.
[11]	叶子青马建平叶一舵. 大学生在线音乐感知价值的作用机制：基于结构方程混合模型[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(2): 372-378.
[12]	兰泽波林梅宋子明孟珠姜琨闫国利. 听障大学生阅读中的语音激活：来自绕口令效应的证据[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(2): 491-497.
[13]	王伊萌王振东汪凤炎. 正念与大学生智慧推理的关系：个人成长主动性的部分中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(1): 54-60.
[14]	赵芳芳赵辉李平秦金亮. 父母生涯相关行为和学前教育专业大学生专业满意度的关系：生涯适应力和生涯规划的中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(1): 68-74.
[15]	张环侯双刘拓杨海波. 社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的性别差异：来自关系动机的影响作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(1): 142-148.