老年人结构型社会资本与抑郁的随机截距交叉滞后分析 *

doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230616

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用随机截距的交叉滞后模型,使用中国健康与养老追踪调查（CHARLS）2013年、2015年和2018年三波的数据,探究老年人结构型社会资本与抑郁之间的关系。结果表明：（1）在交叉滞后效应上,老年人抑郁程度能显著负向预测结构型社会资本;（2）抑郁对老年人结构型社会资本的显著影响仅发生在后一阶段（T2→T3）;（3）老年人结构型社会资本与抑郁的交叉滞后关系具有跨性别的不变性,但呈现出婚姻的差异。

关键词: 结构型社会资本, 老年人, 抑郁, 随机截距交叉滞后模型

Abstract:

Background:The physical and mental health problems among older adults have gradually become the focus in the field of mental health. The Social Capital Theory is a new approach to improve the mental health of the elderly and alleviate depression. Structural social capital originates from the concept of social capital and emphasizes practical participation in various networks, including formal activities and informal contacts. Previous studies have shown that structural social capital has a negative impact on depression. Specifically, regular participation in social activities and frequent contact with others can reduce the risk of depression. However, most prior studies were cross-sectional, which identified the impact of structural social capital on depression among foreign residents, middle-aged and young people. There is a lack of longitudinal research investigating the impact of depression on structural social capital among the elderly. Based on the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), this study used a random intercept cross-lagged panel model to explore the causal relationship between structural social capital and depression in older adults.

Methods:CHARLS is a large-scale longitudinal survey designed to investigate the social, economic, and health status of residents aged 45 and over in Chinese Mainland. This study used three waves of data, including 2013, 2015, and 2018 data from CHARLS. Structural social capital was measured by participation in 9 activities in the past month, and the depressive symptom was assessed by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale. First, the Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to examine the association between structural social capital and depression. Next, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to investigate the difference between different sex and marriage. At last, A random intercept cross-lagged panel model was used to find the cross-time relationship between structural social capital and depression. All data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and Mplus 8.3.

Results:The results indicated that: (1) The random intercept cross-lagged panel model revealed that depression had a significant negative impact on the structural social capital, while the impact of structural social capital on depression was not significant. (2) The significant impact of depression on structural social capital was found in the latter stage (T2→T3). Compared with the former stage (T1→T2), it showed a significant upward trend in the latter (T2→T3). (3) There was a significantly different cross-lagged relationship between a widow and married elderly, while no difference existed between males and females.

Conclusion:The one-way impact of depression on structural social capital among older adults was found. This significant impact only occurred in the latter stage owing to the development and severity of the depression. This evidence highlights the importance of depression in older adults and suggests the impact of structural social capital to prevent subsequent depression among widowed adults.

Key words: structural social capital, older adults, depression, Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model (RI-CLPM)

俞懿, 黎光明. 老年人结构型社会资本与抑郁的随机截距交叉滞后分析^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1399-1407.

Yu Yi, Li Guangming. A Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis of Structural Social Capital and Depression in Older Adults[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2023, 46(6): 1399-1407.

参考文献

[1] 鲍振宙, 江艳平, 朱键军, 张卫, 孙昊. (2019). 越轨同伴交往与青少年问题性网络使用的交叉滞后分析. 心理科学, 42(5), 1134-1140.
[2] 常捷, 马伟, 王束枚, 伊向仁, 王淑康, 孙晓杰. (2017). 城市老年人社会资本与焦虑、抑郁的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 31(4), 301-306.
[3] 郭佳敏. (2020). 社会参与对我国老年人心理健康的影响研究 (硕士学位论文). 吉林大学,长春.
[4] 马静怡. (2014). 老年抑郁、焦虑与认知功能的现状、影响因素及其关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 山西师范大学,太原.
[5] 马颖, 秦侠, 陈任, 李峰, 张柯, 任于果, 胡志. (2010). 城乡社区老年期抑郁症与社会支持的关系. 中国老年学杂志, 30(4), 519-521.
[6] 谭翠莲, 罗序亮, 李琴. (2021). 丧偶对中国老年人抑郁状况的影响分析——基于CHARLS数据. 南方人口, 36(3), 56-66.
[7] 王燕, 高健, 石秀梅, 熊英, 王莹. (2010). 社区老年人抑郁倾向影响因素研究. 天津护理, 18(6), 311-313.
[8] 王瑜, 袁尚. (2022). 社会资本对农村老年人心理健康的影响. 中国延安干部学院学报, 15(2), 125-136.
[9] 王一琳, 于思敏, 梁曼茹. (2019). 社区参与与老年人心理健康的系统评价及建议. 学理论, 1, 84-85.
[10] 肖颖, 王永梅. (2020). 社会参与对老年人心理健康的影响——基于 CLASS 追踪调查数据的实证分析. 社会福利(理论版), 8, 24-31.
[11] 杨纾加, 温玉洁. (2003). 影响老年人健康相关因素的研究进展. 华夏医学, 16(4), 595-597.
[12] 杨玉娇. (2018). 纽带式、桥梁式社会资本与孤独感的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型 (硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学,西安.
[13] 姚尚莹, 王林珠, 朱雅丽. (2020). 丧偶对老年人社会活动参与的影响研究——基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)数据的分析. 生产力研究, 11, 1-4.
[14] 殷华西, 刘莎莎, 宋广文. (2014). 我国老年人心理健康的研究现状及其展望. 中国健康心理学杂志, 22(10), 1566-1569.
[15] 于晓琪, 李哲能, 方圆, 董妍. (2021). 青少年智能手机问题性使用与焦虑的交叉滞后分析. 心理科学, 44(4), 866-872.
[16] 袁帅, 曹文蕊, 张曼玉, 吴诗雅, 魏馨怡. (2021). 通向更精确的因果分析: 交叉滞后模型的新进展. 中国人力资源开发, 38(2), 23-41.
[17] 赵娜, 赖华. (2020). 中国老年人心理健康水平变迁的横断历史研究: 1993-2016. 心理研究, 13(3), 236-244.
[18] 甄月桥, 郭潇谊, 朱茹华. (2021). 老年人社会支持、心理资本与心理健康关系研究. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版), 46(1), 73-81.
[19] Aronen, E. T., & Soininen, M. (2000). Childhood depressive symptoms predict psychiatric problems in young adults. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45(5), 465-470.
[20] Cao W. M., Li L., Zhou X. D., & Zhou C. (2015). Social capital and depression: Evidence from urban elderly in China. Aging and Mental Health, 19(5), 418-429.
[21] Chen Y. S., Yang C. J., & Feng S. J. (2019). The effect of social communication on life satisfaction among the rural elderly: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), Article 3791.
[22] Dao A. T. M., Nguyen V. T., Nguyen H. V., & Nguyen, L. T. K. (2018). Factors associated with depression among the elderly living in urban Vietnam. BioMed Research International, 2018, Article 2370284.
[23] De Silva M. J., McKenzie K., Harpham T., & Huttly, S. R. A. (2005). Social capital and mental illness: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(8), 619-627.
[24] González, G., & Vives, A. (2019). Work status, financial stress, family problems, and gender differences in the prevalence of depression in Chile. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 63(3), 359-370.
[25] Han K. M., Han C. S., Shin C., Jee H. J., An H., Yoon H. K., & Kim S. H. (2018). Social capital, socioeconomic status, and depression in community-living elderly. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 98, 133-140.
[26] Harpham T., Grant E., & Thomas E. (2002). Measuring social capital within health surveys: Key issues. Health Policy and Planning, 17(1), 106-111.
[27] Himanshu H., Arokiasamy P., & Talukdar B. (2019). Illustrative effects of social capital on health and quality of life among older adult in India: Results from WHO-SAGE India. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 82, 15-21.
[28] Little T. D.(2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press..
[29] Mulat N., Gutema H., & Wassie G. T. (2021). Prevalence of depression and associated factors among elderly people in Womberma District, north-west, Ethiopia. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), Article 136.
[30] Parker, G., & Brotchie, H. (2010). Gender differences in depression. International Review of Psychiatry, 22(5), 429-436.
[31] Wang R. Y., Feng Z. X., Liu Y., & Lu Y. (2020). Relationship between neighbourhood social participation and depression among older adults: A longitudinal study in China. Health and Social Care in the Community, 28(1), 247-259.
[32] Yamaguchi M., Inoue Y., Shinozaki T., Saito M., Takagi D., Kondo K., & Kondo N. (2019). Community social capital and depressive symptoms among older people in Japan: A multilevel longitudinal study. Journal of Epidemiology, 29(10), 363-369.
[33] Yoo, J. H., & Jeong, E. J. (2017). Psychosocial effects of SNS use: A longitudinal study focused on the moderation effect of social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 108-119.

老年人结构型社会资本与抑郁的随机截距交叉滞后分析^*

A Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis of Structural Social Capital and Depression in Older Adults

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	谭晓磊, 何灿群. 文本界面因素对老年人数字阅读的影响研究 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(6): 1305-1312.
[2]	巴俊秀, 王立君. 抑郁倾向个体对社会和金钱奖励的敏感性：奖励概率的作用 ^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(5): 1220-1227.
[3]	刘正杰, 周小娟, 李青璇, 曾子洋, 李红, 张仲明. 奖赏正波和晚期正电位联合预测抑郁倾向：基于ERP的研究^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 980-990.
[4]	王子豪, 杨海波. 不同性别大学生网络游戏成瘾、焦虑与抑郁的症状网络差异^*[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 999-1007.
[5]	杨艳宇李其容李春萱. 常见抑郁症状高风险群体在职业转换后的抑郁症状变化[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(3): 652-659.
[6]	何立媛白玉赵星刘妮娜王永胜吴捷. 汉语阅读中副中央凹信息加工的老化：来自词N+2预视的证据[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(3): 514-521.
[7]	万雨霞焦丹阳张莉刘春雨王言胡晓倩王美萍. 父母教养行为与青少年早期抑郁的关系：多基因与负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(1): 203-211.
[8]	金豆张宝山党清秀张何雅婷. 老年人自尊、希望和抑郁关系的纵向研究[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(1): 90-96.
[9]	王歆睿韩布新. 基于微信平台的研究生积极心理干预[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(1): 230-237.
[10]	黄顺森罗玉晗来枭雄简可雯徐梓婧王耘. 中国青少年抑郁的核心症状及性别、抑郁程度间的比较：基于网络分析方法[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1115-1122.
[11]	王琼亓伊静胡伟陈慧玲. 社会拒绝与大学生抑郁情绪的关系：情绪觉察的中介作用和微信亲子沟通的调节作用 [J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1159-1165.
[12]	史珈铭刘晓婷. 社会隔离对老年人认知功能的影响：有调节的链式中介效应[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1182-1189.
[13]	丁雅婷伍麟. 自然语言处理预测抑郁症的技术陷阱与道德风险[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1267-1272.
[14]	王玉龙苏慧娟. 青少年抑郁与自伤关系的追踪研究：亲子沟通的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1243-1250.
[15]	廖友国连榕张妍陈建文. 青少年与父母抑郁情绪的关系：交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(4): 973-979.