基于日常经验取向的责任心理结构研究

心理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 430-435.

基于日常经验取向的责任心理结构研究

况志华

南京理工大学人文学院

收稿日期:2010-09-16 修回日期:2011-09-23 出版日期:2012-03-20 发布日期:2012-03-20
通讯作者: 况志华
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金

The Mental Framework of Responsibility: An Everyday-Experience Approach Study

KUANG ZhiHua

Received:2010-09-16 Revised:2011-09-23 Online:2012-03-20 Published:2012-03-20
Contact: KUANG ZhiHua

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于日常经验取向，运用理论建构和深度访谈的方法，研究责任的心理结构以及责任情境的认知特征。对207名被试访谈研究的结果表明：（1）责任是人们频繁感知和体验到的一种社会心理现象；（2）人们体察到的责任情境，在职业活动和个人生活领域存在类型上的差异；（3）在职业活动中，人们更倾向于将责任归因于他人，而在个人生活中更倾向于归因于自己；（4）人们对责任情境性质的判定与责任事件最终能否达到预期目标有关；（5）责任心理结构共由情境起因、自我效能、成就感、内外动机等20个核心要素构成；（6）责任心理结构是一个由责任认知、责任情感和责任行为三者构成的一元单向决定模式。

关键词: 责任, 责任情境, 心理结构, 日常经验取向

Abstract: Responsibility is a social and cultural phenomenon, as well as a mental and behavioral phenomenon. To analysis and enquire the psychological law of responsibility, from the viewpoint of social psychology, is of profound theoretical and practical significance. In this paper, based on an everyday-experience approach, both methods consisted of theoretical analysis and interview study with 207 participators are used to analysis the mental framework of responsibility, and several other issues related to responsibility situations. The results are: (1) Responsibility is a social phenomenon experienced continually by people in everyday life. (2) The kind of responsibility situation recalled by interviewer is different in private and professional life: the former focuses interrelation, whereas the latter focuses performing duty. (3) In professional life, the causation of the situation tends to be attributed to other people; but in private life, it used to be attributed to oneself. (4) The judgment of responsibility situation depends upon if the results of the situation fit one’s expectation. (5) The mental factors of responsibility consist of 20 primary elements, such as causation of the situation, self-efficacy, the sense of achievement, inner motive, and so on. (6) The mental framework of responsibility is made up of responsibility cognition, responsibility emotion and responsibility conduct, which forms a one-way operating pattern.

Key words: responsibility, responsibility situation, mental framework, everyday-experience approach

况志华. 基于日常经验取向的责任心理结构研究[J]. 心理科学, 2012, 35(2): 430-435.

KUANG ZhiHua. The Mental Framework of Responsibility: An Everyday-Experience Approach Study[J]. Psychological Science, 2012, 35(2): 430-435.

参考文献

1 Shaver G, Schatte D. Towards a broader psychological foundation for responsibility: Who, what, how. In Auhagen, Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon. Routledge, 2001: 35, 35-47, 45 2 Birnbacher D. Philosophical foundations of responsibility. In Auhagen, Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon. Routledge, 2001: 9-22 3 Auhagen A, Bierhoff H. Responsibility at the beginning of the third millennium. In Auhagen, Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon. Routledge, 2001: 179-184 4 Montada L. Denial of responsibility. Responsibility: In Auhagen, Bierhoff (Eds.), The many faces of a social phenomenon. Routledge, 2001: 79-92 5 Hinde A. Responsibility: A biological perspective. In Auhagen, Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon. Routledge, 2001: 23-33 6 Schwartz H. Normative influences on altruism, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social psychology. New York: Academic press, 1977(10): 221-279 7 Weiner B. Judgments of Responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: The Guilford Press, 1995: 1-23 8 Weiner B. An attributional approach to perceived responsibility for transgressions: Extensions to child abuse, punishment goals and political ideology. In Auhagen, Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon. Routledge, 2001: 49-59, 51 9 Schlenker B R, Britt T W, Pennington, etc. The triangle model of responsibility. psychological Review, 1994, 101: 632-652. 10 Schlenker B R. Personal responsibility: Applications of the triangle model. In Cummings L L, Staw B(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1997, 241-301. 11 Britt T W. Engaging the Self in the Field: Testing the Triangle Model of Responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999, 25(6): 698-708. 12 Rudolph T J. Triangulating Political Responsibility: The Motivated Formation of Responsibility Judgments. Political Psychology, 2006, 27(1): 99-122. 13 Wohl M A, Pritchard E T, Kelly T. How Responsible are People for Their Employment Situation? An Application of the Triangle Model of Responsibility. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 2002, 34(3): 201-209. 14 Christopher A N, Schlenker B R. The Protestant Work Ethic and Attributions of Responsibility: Applications of the Triangle Model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2005, 35(7): 1502-1518. 15 维纳 B著, 张爱卿等译. 责任推断: 社会行为的理论基础. 华东师范大学出版社, 2004: 1-2, 83-109, 208 16 林钟敏. 大学生对学习行为的责任归因. 心理学报, 2001, 33(1): 37-42 17 张爱卿, 刘华山. 人际责任推断与行为应对策略的归因分析. 心理学报, 2003, 35(2): 231-236 18 张爱卿, 刘华山. 责任、情感及帮助行为的归因结构模型. 心理学报, 2003, 35(4): 535-540 19 况志华, 叶浩生. 大学生对网瘾和作弊的责任推断与应对策略. 应用心理学, 2008, 14(1), 014-021 20 Auhagen, A. Responsibility in everyday life. Responsibility: In Auhagen, Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon. Routledge, 2001: 61-77, 63

[1]	周天爽潘玥杉崔丽娟杨莹. 权力感与助人行为：社会距离的中介和责任感的调节[J]. , 2020, (5): 1250-1257.
[2]	郭钟泽谢宝国程延园. 发展机会、乐观和工作投入：任务责任心的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2017, 40(1): 160-167.
[3]	刘世宏李丹刘晓洁陈欣银. 青少年的学校适应问题：家庭亲密度、家庭道德情绪和责任感的作用[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(3): 617-624.
[4]	吴鹏刘华山鲁路捷田梦潇. 青少年网络不道德行为与父母教养方式的关系——道德脱离、责任心、道德同一性的中介作用[J]. 心理科学, 2013, 36(2): 372-377.
[5]	侯春娜伍麟刘志军. 家庭因素中父母情感温暖、文化性与责任心对大学生职业决策自我效能的中介与中介调节研究[J]. 心理科学, 2013, 36(1): 103-108.
[6]	王怀勇刘永芳. 责任归因对公平感与情感承诺关系的调节作用研究[J]. 心理科学, 2012, 35(5): 1202-1206.
[7]	温芳芳祁超. 财富?责任?幸福的心理学观——首届中部心理学高峰论坛综述[J]. 心理科学, 2012, 35(3): 767-767.
[8]	陈思静马剑虹. 第三方惩罚与社会规范激活——社会责任感与情绪的作用[J]. 心理科学, 2011, 34(3): 670-675.