[1]Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M..Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs[J].NeuroReport,2004,15:545-548
[2].Event-related potentials associated with semantic priming.
[3].The processing nature of the N400: evidence from masked primin
[4].The N400 as a function of the level of processin
[5].The mechanism underlying backward priming in a lexical decision task: Spreading activation versus semantic matchin
[6]Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Gross-Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41, 60-74
[7]Deacon, D., Hewitt, S., Yang, C. M., & Nagata, M. (2000). Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 137-146
[8]Frishkoff, G. A., Tucker, D. M., Davey C. (2004). Frontal and posterior sources of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(3):329-354
[9]Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R. M. (2009). Semantic unification. The Cognitive Neurosciences, 19–36. Boston, MIT Press
[10]Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2009) . ERP effects of short interval masked associative and repetition priming. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 301-312
[11]Holcomb, P. J., Reder, L., Misra, M., & Grainger, J. (2005). The effects of prime visibility on ERP measures of masked priming. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 155-172
[12]Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47-61
[13]Kiang, M., & Kutas, M. (2005). Association of schizotypy with semantic processing differences: An event-related brain potential study. Schizophr Research, 77, 329-342
[14]Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205
[15]Kutas,M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect work expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163
[16]Luo, Y. J., Hu, S., Weng, X. C., & Wei, J. H. (1999). The effects of semantic discrimination of Chinese words on N400 component of event-related potentials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 185-193
[17]Meyer, D., Schvaneveldt, R., & Ruddy, M. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on word recognition [M]. In P. M. A. Rabbit & S. Dornic (Eds.) , Attention and performance, 5, 98-117. New York, Academic Press
[18]Rossell, S. L., Bullmore, E. T., & Williams, S. C. R..Brain activation during automatic and controlled processing of semantic relations: A priming experiment using lexical decision[J].Neuropsychology,2001,39(11):1167-1176
[19]Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistics perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 227-269
[20]Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568
[21]Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2006). Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain Language, 97, 279-293
[22]Wang, Q. H, Huang, H., & Mao, L. T. (2009). N400 repetition effect in unidentifiable Chinese characters: evidence for automatic process. Neuroreport, 20, 723-728
[23]Wang, Q. H., & Yuan, J. J. (2008). N400 lexicality effect in highly blurred Chinese words: evidence for automatic processing. Neuroreport, 19, 173-178
[24].N400 lexicality effect in highly blurred Chinese words: evidence for automatic processin
[25]Brain Research Bulletin, 86, 179-188
[26]West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J..Imaginal semantic and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: an eletrophysiological investigation[J].Cognitive Neuroscience,2000,12:1024-1037
|