[1]Benjamin, A. S. & Diaz, M. (2008). Measurement of relative metamnemonic accuracy. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of Memory and Metamemory (pp. 73-94). New York, New York: Psychology Press
[2]Benjamin, A. S., Diaz, M. L., & Wee, S..Signal detection with criterion noise: Applications to recognition memory[J].Psychological Review,2009,116(1):84-115
[3]Butterfield.[J].B. & Metcalfe, J. (2006). The correction of errors committed with high confidence. Metacognition and Learning,1556,1:-
[4]Connor, L. T., Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. Psychology and Aging, 12, 50-71
[5]Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228-232
[6]Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Judgments of learning are influenced by memory for past test. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 19-34
[7]Hourihan, K., Benjamin, A. S., & Liu, X. (2011). An own-race bias in metamnemonic accuracy for faces. Memory and Cognition. Paper under review
[8]Kimball, D. R, & Metcalfe, J. (2003). Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory and Cognition, 31, 918-929
[9]Konopka, A. E., & Benjamin, A. S. (2009). Schematic knowledge changes what judgments of learning predict in a source memory task. Memory and Cognition, 37, 42-51
[10]Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370
[11]Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user’s guide. (Second Edition). USA: Psychology Pres
[12]Masson, M. E. J., & Rotello, C. M..Sources of bias in the Goodman–Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: Implications for studies of metacognitive processes[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2009,35:509-527
[13]Matzen, L. E. & Benjamin, A. S..Remembering words not presented in sentences: How study context changes patterns of false memories[J].Memory and Cognition,2009,37(1):52-64
[14]Mazzoni.[J].G., & Nelson, T. O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1263,21:-
[15]Metcalfe, J., & Greene, M.J. (2007). Metacognition of agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 184-199
[16]Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of feeling-of-knowing accuracy. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133
[17]Nelson, T. O..ROC curves and measures of discrimination accuracy: A reply to Swets[J].Psychological Bulletin,1986,100:128-132
[18]Nelson, T. O. (1996). Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item, not of the absolute performance on an individual item: Comments on Schraw (1995). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 257-260
[19]Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). The delayed-JoL effect: When delaying your judgments of learning can improve the accuracy of your metacognitive monitoring. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270
[20]Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods, 9, 53-69
[21]Nietfeld, J. L., Enders, C. K., & Schraw, G..A Monte Carlo comparison of measures of relative and absolute monitoring accuracy[J].Educational and Psychological Measurement,2006,66(2):258-271
[22]Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration— an extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 3-3
[23]Schraw, G..A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring[J].Metacognition and Learning,2009,4:33-45
[24]Swets, J. A. .Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models. [J].Psychological Bulletin,1986,99:100-117
[25]Tullis, J.G. & Benjamin, A. S..On the effectiveness of self-paced learning. [J].Journal of Memory and Language,2011,64:109-118
[26]Weaver, C. A., III, & Kelemen, W. L..Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: Evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,2003,29:1058-1065
|