心理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 807-813.

• 基础、实验与工效 • 上一篇    下一篇

注意促进效应依赖于项目-背景的质心间距

孙玉荣,胡瑞晨,任衍具   

  1. 山东师范大学
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-18 修回日期:2016-01-26 出版日期:2016-07-20 发布日期:2016-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 任衍具

Attentional Boost Effect Dependent on Item-Background Centriod Distance

  • Received:2015-06-18 Revised:2016-01-26 Online:2016-07-20 Published:2016-07-20
  • Contact: Yanju Ren

摘要: 近期研究者发现, 在某些条件下增加对第一任务的注意能够提高伴随发生的第二任务的成绩, 并将其命名为注意促进效应。研究者提出双任务交互模型对之进行解释, 认为该效应产生的必要条件是时间上的重叠, 而不受空间距离的影响。基于对这一观点的质疑, 本研究探究了检测项目与背景图片的质心间距对注意促进效应的影响。结果发现, 当目标项位于背景图片中央时(质心间距为0), 表现出注意促进效应; 而当二者分开一定的空间距离时, 出现了注意干扰/抑制效应。由此可见, 项目和背景的质心间距会对注意促进效应产生影响。

关键词: 快速的任务无关知觉学习, 质心间距, 注意促进效应, 双任务

Abstract: The attentional boost effect (ABE), also called fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning, refers to a phenomenon that transient increasing in attention to one task enhances performance in a second task. The previous studies mainly investigated the temporal characteristics of ABE. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the spatial distribution of it. Specifically speaking, whether the centriod distance between the items and background images will influence the phenomenon or not. RSVP paradigm is employed and Participants are required to remember a series of scene images (500 ms/ image) while they performed a simple detection task (detect a white square, 100 ms/square) that was irrelevant to the scene images memory task. For the detection task, participants pressed a spacebar whenever the fixation point was a white square (target) rather than a black square (distractors). There are two conditions in this study: in one condition, squares overlap on scene images, and in other condition, squares are presented on the left or right side of the images (2.0°gap). After completing the dual-task encoding phase, participants performed a four-alternative-forced-choice (4AFC) recognition test on the scenes. Twenty undergraduates participated in the overlap condition and eighteen undergraduates participated in the gap condition. The stimuli were presented on a 19'' monitor (1024×768 pixels, 75 Hz) with a Lenovo computer (Pentium (R) Dual-Core CPU E5700, 3.00 GHz) using E-Prime. The main results were as following: (a) in the overlap condition, the likelihood that a scene was correctly recognized depended on the scene’s serial position during encoding (F(2, 62) = 4.36, p = .017), that is, scene identity memory was more accurate for scenes encoded at the target position than at the pre- and post- target positions (p = .040, p = .024), consistent with Swallow & Jiang (2010) 's results. (b) in the gap condition, the likelihood that a scene was correctly recognized depended on the scene’s serial position during encoding (F(2, 62) = 6.68, p = .002), scene identity memory was less accurate for scenes encoded at the target position than at the pre- and post- target positions (p = .041, p = .041), showing contrary to ABE. Two possible explanation for these results are purposed: reduced encoding account and attentional shift account. It was concluded that the centriod distance between items and background scene images has an impact on the ABE. When items (squares in this study) overlap on the background scene images (centriod distance equal zero), the observers have more accurate for scene encoded at the target position than at the pre- and post- target positions, showing ABE. And when items are presented on the left or right side of the images (2.0°gap), the observers have less accurate for scene encode at the target position than at the pre- and post- target positions.

Key words: fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning, centriod distance, attentional boost effect, dual-task