Journal of Psychological Science ›› 2024, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 450-457.DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240223

• Social, Personality & Organizational Psychology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dependence or Separation: The Relationship between Ingroup Favoritism and Outgroup Derogation

Qiao Yalan1,2, Wen Fangfang1,3, Zuo Bin4,1, Ke Wenlin1, Song Shijie1, Wang Jing1   

  1. 1School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Social Psychology, Central China Normal University, 430079;
    2GuanLan Second Primary School, Shenzhen, 518110;
    3Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, 430079;
    4Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006
  • Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-02-29

依赖或分离:内群体偏爱和外群体贬损的关系*

乔亚兰1,2, 温芳芳**1,3, 佐斌**4,1, 柯文琳1, 宋仕婕1, 王晶1   

  1. 1华中师范大学心理学院暨社会心理研究中心,武汉,430079;
    2深圳市龙华区观澜第二小学,深圳,518110;
    3青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉,430079;
    4中山大学心理学系,广州,510006
  • 通讯作者: **温芳芳,E-mail: wenff@ccnu.edu.cn;佐斌,E-mail: zuobin@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    *本研究得到国家社科基金重大项目(18ZDA331)、国家社科后期资助项目(20FSHB003)、渭南师范学院校级人文社科项目(2018RC02) 和国家自科面上项目(32271128)的资助

Abstract: Intergroup relation has always been the cornerstone of social psychology research. Some studies have found that the existence of ingroup favoritism depends on outgroup derogation, while the others have found that ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation are separated, and the vagueness of the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation has led to a constant debate among researchers. Based on the psychological needs of group members and the intergroup factors of group interaction, this paper attempts to find the important factors that influence the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation. This paper summarizes the essence, relationship and factors of ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation, which mainly includes the following three aspects.
First of all, the research shows that ingroup favoritism is widespread, and the researchers mainly explain the psychological mechanism of ingroup favoritism according to social identity theory, social projection theory and the theory of bounded generalized reciprocity. These three theories respectively focus on group identity, self and group similarity perception, and the value of group cooperation to explain ingroup favoritism. As for outgroup derogation, the researchers mainly explain its psychological mechanism from the perspective of the realistic group conflict and the integrated threat theory. According to the theory of realistic group conflict, hostility among groups occurs more due to the competition for resources, which leads to prejudice against opposing outgroup. The integrated threat theory focuses on conflicts caused by perceived symbolic threats.
Secondly, this paper expounds the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation from two aspects of dependence and separation. On the one hand, some evidence has shown that ingroup favoritism depends on outgroup derogation, that is, ingroup favoritism can be driven by outgroup derogation. The essence of ingroup favoritism depending on outgroup derogation might improve individual self-esteem and maintain advantage. On the other hand, the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation may be separated. Pure ingroup favoritism (without outgroup derogation) does not involve injustice towards outgroup members, whereas pure outgroup derogation is rarer. Pure outgroup derogation may exist in people who have experienced social isolation or negative experiences both in their ingroup and outgroup, and therefore has difficulty developing ingroup favoritism but holds significant hostility to outgroup.
Finally, from the perspective of the psychological needs of group members and intergroup factors of group interaction, this paper sorts out the important factors that influence the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation. The relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation is influenced by different degrees of group identity. Specifically, when the group identity is slight and no other influencing factors are involved, an individual only shows ingroup favoritism; However, when the group identity is highlighted, the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation increases. Besides, the motivations of outgroup derogation and ingroup favoritism are different. The motivation of ingroup favoritism is to help ingroup members, which is related to the degree of closeness and importance of group members, while the motivation of outgroup derogation may be to harm outgroup members. The main situational conditions to increase the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation are group threat and resource competition.
In conclusion, future research can adopt empirical study to find out the role of influencing factors in the relationship between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation, and it is also suggested to clarify the boundary between ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation by combining social cognitive paradigms and strategy manipulation.

Key words: intergroup relation, ingroup favoritism, outgroup derogation, group identity, group threat

摘要: 内群体偏爱表现为将积极态度和更多资源分配给内群体成员,外群体贬损表现为对外群体成员的敌意、歧视和不公平态度。研究发现,内群体偏爱和外群体贬损存在依赖或分离这两种关系。从群体成员的心理需求和群体互动的群际因素出发,找到影响两者关系的重要因素:群体认同、动机意图、群际威胁和资源竞争。进行实证研究更精准地找出这些影响因素在二者关系上的作用,采用多样社会认知范式和策略操纵结合的方法厘清二者关系,是未来研究的重要方向。

关键词: 群际关系, 内群体偏爱, 外群体贬损, 群体认同, 群体威胁